Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?): perpetually requeueing j

2008-12-08 Thread Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
riday, December 05, 2008 3:38 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?): perpetually requeueing j On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:07 AM

Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?): perpetually requeueing j

2008-12-05 Thread Ed Wilts
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:07 AM, toaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > >> >> I just hope that 6.5.4 will be out before the next DST change ;) > > > Back in October at the NetBackup Customer Forum in Roseville, I heard that > 6.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?): perpetually requeueing j

2008-12-05 Thread Ed Wilts
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:07 AM, toaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > I just hope that 6.5.4 will be out before the next DST change ;) Back in October at the NetBackup Customer Forum in Roseville, I heard that 6.5.4 was targeted for the March time frame. The 2009 DST change is March 8. ..

[Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?): perpetually requeueing j

2008-12-05 Thread toaster
By the way, about that problem, the case from symantec was close, because the bug will be fixed in 6.5.4 (http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/313300.htm) , it is not fixed in 6.5.3 (http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/307880.htm). I just hope that 6.5.4 will be out before the next D

Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?): perpetually requeueing j

2008-11-04 Thread Curtis Preston
ian Group Inc, Unix/Linux/VMware Sysadmin / Backup & Recovery [EMAIL PROTECTED], 215 231 1556 -Original Message- From: toaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 10:28 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond

Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?): perpetually requeueing j

2008-11-03 Thread Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
p Inc, Unix/Linux/VMware Sysadmin / Backup & Recovery [EMAIL PROTECTED], 215 231 1556 -Original Message- From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 10:41 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (a

Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?): perpetually requeueing j

2008-11-03 Thread ckstehman
11/03/2008 10:31 AM Please respond to VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu cc Subject [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?): perpetuallyrequeueing j Same thing here, with Solaris 10. It is strange because the requeue occured began 2 hours

Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?): perpetually requeueing j

2008-11-03 Thread Ed Wilts
This issue? http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/313300.htm On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:28 AM, toaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Same thing here, with Solaris 10. It is strange because the requeue > occured began 2 hours before the actual DST change...? > > Case opened, will see what they

Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?): perpetually requeueing j

2008-11-03 Thread Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
& Recovery [EMAIL PROTECTED], 215 231 1556 -Original Message- From: toaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 10:28 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?): perpetually requeueing j Same thing here, w

[Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?): perpetually requeueing j

2008-11-03 Thread toaster
Same thing here, with Solaris 10. It is strange because the requeue occured began 2 hours before the actual DST change...? Case opened, will see what they have to say :) +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Centr