Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
12/23/2008 12:08 AM
Please respond to
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
To
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] Standalone to Custered migration
Jack.Forester wrote:
> I seem to remember reading in the HA guide
Jack.Forester wrote:
> I seem to remember reading in the HA guide that going from a non-clustered
> server to a clustered server is not supported. Doesn't mean it's not
> possible, though. Marianne's suggestion of building the server as a cluster,
> then doing a bprecover sounds like it might
lan.com
Phone: +1.304.554.6039
"spaldam"
Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
12/22/2008 09:27 AM
Please respond to
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
To
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] Standalone to Custered migration
We've te
We've tested doing it in the order you described as well, but after the
recovery the cluster configuration within NetBackup gets messed up as netbackup
looses any knowledge of it being clustered. Once again it appears to be
because the EMM database gets overwritten; this time with the recovere
We are using the clustering script that comes with NetBackup. The problem I
think is that the script drops the old EMM database and recreates a new one
with the new cluster configuration. It then says it's populating the new
database, but apparently it's not doing a very good job of putting a
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:11 PM, spaldam
wrote:
>
> I'm trying to replace the Master server with some new hardware, (simple
> enough to do, and I've done this successfully before) but I'd also like to
> cluster the master server. I've done some testing on this using a catalog
> recovery that look
I'm trying to replace the Master server with some new hardware, (simple enough
to do, and I've done this successfully before) but I'd also like to cluster the
master server. I've done some testing on this using a catalog recovery that
looks perfectly fine at first, until it's brought into the
