Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610

2013-06-05 Thread pranav batra
failing. Now this is something new to troubleshoot. PranavB To: pranav_vent...@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610 From: ken_zuf...@goodyear.com Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:35:26 -0400 How often are you running the backups? If TIR information has dropped off for

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610

2013-06-04 Thread pranav batra
We are only trying to synthesize full and differential. We are not taking cumulative and still backup is failing with 610. Thanks,PranavB To: sm...@peppas.gr CC: pranav_vent...@hotmail.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610 From

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610

2013-06-04 Thread ken_zufall
ect: RE: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610 But , I think that you can run differential incrementals and synthesize a cumulative backup. Then you can use the full and the latest synthetic cumulative and create a new synthetic full. As you do not mix incremental and cumulati

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610

2013-06-04 Thread smpt1
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of ken_zuf...@goodyear.com Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:33 PM To: pranav_vent...@hotmail.com Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610 We had a similar

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610

2013-06-04 Thread ken_zufall
antec support. Ken Zufall Operating Systems Administrator The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company From: pranav batra To: Veritas Date: 06/04/2013 02:53 AM Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610 Sent by:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Hello Gee

[Veritas-bu] Synthetic backups failing with 610

2013-06-03 Thread pranav batra
Hello Geeks, I am here facing issues with synthetic backup. There are 7-8 windows 2008 clients that are giving me issues with synthetic backup.The backup is failing with 610. 1: (610) end point terminated with an error Environment : Master windows 2008 R2 -7.5.0.5Client 7.5.0.5 -2008R2 We are t

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-08 Thread Jim Horalek
uburn.edu Cc: j...@federaledge.com; jhilt...@excite.com Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups > There is a case open with Symantec about this issue, and I am told an > EEB will be made available soon. > > You are not supposed to have to keep a full around, No. You _must_ have a full pl

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-08 Thread bob944
> There is a case open with Symantec about this issue, and I am told > an EEB will be made available soon. > > You are not supposed to have to keep a full around, No. You _must_ have a full plus subsequent TIR and diffs or cincs to synthesize a new full, but it does not matter how the full was g

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-08 Thread Jim Horalek
RITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups There is a case open with Symantec about this issue, and I am told an EEB will be made available soon. You are not supposed to have to keep a full around, but once the full expires a new full is taken automagically

[Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-08 Thread Jim H
There is a case open with Symantec about this issue, and I am told an EEB will be made available soon. You are not supposed to have to keep a full around, but once the full expires a new full is taken automagically. Quote +--

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread W. Curtis Preston
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Crowey Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 10:52 PM To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups cpreston wrote: > And you're verifying that the original

[Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread Crowey
cpreston wrote: > And you're verifying that the original full does not need to be kept around? > OK ... I missed two important points I guess. With a 1 month retention period, I always have 4 (weekly) synthetic backups in my library, and so yes I've never had any problem about recovering fi

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread W. Curtis Preston
N.EDU Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups Gidday, I've been running synthetics for nearly two years now to backup about 3/3.5 TBs and have to say has generally run extremely well. Within the same policy I have 3 schedules. The first is an ad-hoc full - I used this to create the first f

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups Or May A Red Herring.

2009-07-07 Thread Jim Horalek (Federal Edge)
, July 07, 2009 5:11 PM To: Jim Horalek Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups >From what I've read, and from what Curtis says below, you DON'T need to keep >the original full backup around, once you've created at least one more &g

[Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread Crowey
Gidday, I've been running synthetics for nearly two years now to backup about 3/3.5 TBs and have to say has generally run extremely well. Within the same policy I have 3 schedules. The first is an ad-hoc full - I used this to create the first full backup, and on the very few occasions when the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread Dean
I see what you mean. But I suspect that's just a poorly worded paragraph. The diagram on page 200 of the Admin Guide (Vol 1, Windows version) indicates the original full is not required ongoing. I wish I could say for sure from experience, but I've never been able to get synthetic backups working

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread A Darren Dunham
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:11:46AM +1000, Dean wrote: > >From what I've read, and from what Curtis says below, you DON'T need to keep > the original full backup around, once you've created at least one more > synethtic full backup. You can do just one full backup, then keep creating > synthetic ful

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread Dean
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 1:39 PM > To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU > Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups > > > > > > I've been testing it myself. I think you do need to keep that full > > backup around. The "synthetic" part of a synthe

Re: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread Jim Horalek
] On Behalf Of cpreston Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 1:39 PM To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Subject: [Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups > I've been testing it myself. I think you do need to keep that full > backup around. The "synthetic" part of a synthetic backup is the &

[Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread cpreston
> I've been testing it myself. I think you do need to keep that full backup > around. The "synthetic" part of a synthetic backup is the consolidation of > the full backup and the incrementals into a single image. This is done via > duplication. What makes it synthetic is that it is created

[Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-07-07 Thread tsimerson
Jim, I've been testing it myself. I think you do need to keep that full backup around. The "synthetic" part of a synthetic backup is the consolidation of the full backup and the incrementals into a single image. This is done via duplication. The test scenario I'm working with is the follow

[Veritas-bu] Synthetic Backups

2009-06-25 Thread Jim Horalek
I have a bit of an oddity. I'm testing Synthetic Backups. I have Day 1 Full backup. Day 2 Incremental Day 3 Synthetic-Full Day 4 Incremental (and manually expire the Day 1 Full) Day 5 Full backup runs So it appears I need to keep the Full backup around even though the Synthetic Full is