, October 30, 2008 1:56 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
I can think of no good reason to VM a master server, other than because
I can or because I want to.
leave it be
Schneider, Matthew J. wrote:
Anyone have any update on weather
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Schneider, Matthew J.
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 6:25 PM
To: Honeybrook, Kate; Holowinski,Scott; Curtis Preston;
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Anyone have any update on weather or not the master alone
Infrastructure :: Optimized
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of oersted
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 6:56 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
I can think of no good reason to VM a master
Of Honeybrook, Kate
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 11:54 PM
To: Holowinski, Scott; Curtis Preston; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
As I said earlier we currently have our master server virtualised under
ESX and it was setup by Symantec themselves
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Schneider, Matthew J.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any update on weather or not the master alone is supported as a
VM?
It is not currently supported.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
; Curtis Preston; VERITAS-BU at
mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
As I said earlier we currently have our master server virtualised under
ESX and it was setup by Symantec themselves. Therefore I was under the
impression that virtualizing a master server
NetBackup master or media server functionality is not supported in a Solaris
container either. NBU has to be in the global zone. You can have a
NetBackup client in a container, but not a master or media.
.../Ed
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:25 PM, SIBLEY, Ken R. - ACCOR-NA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Preston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 11:13 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Because many people use their master server as a media server. Symantec's not
going to support it as a master server unless it can also
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.glasshouse.com
Infrastructure :: Optimized
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andrea bolongaro
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 10:27 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
, Solaris Containers, Solaris LDOMs, etc.
Ken
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis Preston
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 1:13 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Because many people
, May 23, 2008 6:46 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Has anyone tried to do this by zoning the tape drives and robot directly
to the guest's WWN via NPIV
and not to disk?
-Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dave Carpe
Sent: Thu 5/22/2008 1:48 PM
To: Curtis Preston; WEAVER, Simon (external); [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
: Thursday, May 22, 2008 9:55 PM
To: Dave Carpe; Curtis Preston; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Dave / Curtis
Ok - 2 conflicting responses here! If its unsupported, then from a business
direction I guess its not a viable
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis Preston
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 8:49 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); Dave Carpe; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Not conflicting responses. Two
(external); Dave Carpe; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Not conflicting responses. Two responses to two questions: does it work at all
and is it supported? It's definitely not supported, but I have found it to
work
; Curtis Preston; WEAVER, Simon (external);
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Can you please be more specific on your massive I/O problems? Are we
talking about SCSI? Fiber? Tape? Disk? VMWare claims 60,000 I/O per
second per ESX
-Original Message-
From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 9:48 AM
To: Martin, Jonathan; Dave Carpe; Curtis Preston;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Jonathan
Seeing as David is from
, Simon (external); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Right - I was trying not to assume anything. For all I know, he means
pure disk. I'm really looking for credible test results of VMWare I/O
issues. I've seen some pretty credible benchmark results
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 8:24 AM
To: Dave Carpe; Curtis Preston; WEAVER, Simon (external);
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Can you please be more specific on your massive I/O problems? Are we
talking about SCSI
Infrastructure :: Optimized
-Original Message-
From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 6:46 AM
To: Curtis Preston; Dave Carpe; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Curtis
Hello everybody,
ok it is not supported.
It' clear for me... problems are related to robotics/san etc...
But why do not support a Virtual Master Server if all robotics
stuff is duty of a physical media server?
regards,
Andrea
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis Preston
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 10:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
When you say they don't support, you must mean that they won't
]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Hi Curtis
Well guess what.. there is a client that is looking at VM'ing Master and
Media Servers and want to use a tape drive or robot!
I am under the impression its not supported or works. Your comments seem
];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Hi Simon
We currently had a Symantec do an upgrade at our site from version 5.1 to
6.5.1. We had a master media server combined on a physical box. After the
upgrade we now a have a virtual master server
-
From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 11:24 PM
To: Curtis Preston; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Hi Curtis
Well guess what.. there is a client that is looking
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis Preston
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 1:13 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
It works for me just fine, but I don't think it's supported.
Curtis Preston | VP Data
PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Hi Simon
We currently had a Symantec do an upgrade at our site from version 5.1 to
6.5.1. We had a master media server combined on a physical box. After the
upgrade we now a have a virtual master
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 6:49 PM
To: Curtis Preston; WEAVER, Simon (external); [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
It is not supported. There are massive problems with the I/O.
David K. Carpe
Principal Systems
:54:41 2008
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Dave / Curtis
Ok - 2 conflicting responses here! If its unsupported, then from a business
direction I guess its not a viable option to go this route. (If what you say is
right with the I/O then that is the last thing I need).
Simon
] | www.glasshouse.com
Infrastructure :: Optimized
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:10 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Is Symantec actually
Is Symantec actually going to be supporting a Virtual Machine as a
Master or Media Server (San Media too), which can use SSO to share a
tape library?
A recent exercise with VMware a few months ago brought to light that
VMware does NOT support guest access to SAN-based tape drives, and has
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Is Symantec actually going to be supporting a Virtual Machine as a
Master or Media Server (San Media too), which can use SSO to share a
tape library?
A recent exercise with VMware a few months ago
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin,
Jonathan
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 2:37 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
The Netbackup 6 OS Compatibility Matrix lists VMWare explicitly and the
only
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:55 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, thats the feeling I got, but I am being strongly advised by a 3rd
party that symantec does support it.
The 3rd party is wrong. Symantec publishes its compatibility lists. It's a
worthwhile read.
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:55 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, thats the feeling I got, but I am being strongly advised by
a 3rd party that symantec does support it.
The 3rd party is wrong. Symantec
14, 2008 10:55 AM
To: Ed Wilts
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Hi Ed
Yes, thats the feeling I got, but I am being strongly advised by a 3rd
party that symantec does support it. However, I am starting to have
doubts about this.
And I
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Hudson, Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are also planning a Windows 6.5.1 Master to backup VMware using the
VCB function.. Am I hearing correctly that this is Not supported by Symantec
??
Not, you're not hearing correctly. You can back up VMware fine -
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hudson,
Steve
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 2:18 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); Ed Wilts
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
We are also planning a Windows 6.5.1 Master to backup VMware using the
VCB function.. Am I
: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
We are also planning a Windows 6.5.1 Master to backup VMware using the
VCB function.. Am I hearing correctly that this is Not supported by
Symantec ??
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi All
Is Symantec actually going to be supporting a Virtual Machine as a
Master or Media Server (San Media too), which can use SSO to share a
tape library?
Understand that 6.5.2 is going to include this, but wanted to seek
clarification on this. any Technotes would help.
Many Thanks
Regards
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VM Master / Media Servers
Is Symantec actually going to be supporting a Virtual Machine as a
Master or Media Server (San Media too), which can use SSO to share a
tape library?
A recent exercise with VMware a few months ago brought
Is Symantec actually going to be supporting a Virtual Machine as a
Master or Media Server (San Media too), which can use SSO to share a
tape library?
A recent exercise with VMware a few months ago brought to light that
VMware does NOT support guest access to SAN-based tape drives, and has no
0n Tue, May 13, 2008 at 07:10:17AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Symantec actually going to be supporting a Virtual Machine as a
Master or Media Server (San Media too), which can use SSO to share a
tape library?
A recent exercise with VMware a few months ago
43 matches
Mail list logo
