I took the 6.5 windows & unix beta tests. I didn't study anything, just
winged it. They're not ALL that much different from previous NetBackup
exams they just have some 6.5 specific function questions added. Study
anything your rep listed as a new and "improved" feature for 6.5 and
that should cover most of it. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 8:50 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 25, Issue 43

Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to
        veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. TIR files on 6.5.1 (Jeff Cleverley)
   2. replacing ndmp drives in SSO configuration (Nathan Kippen)
   3. NBU - Subject Topic Context (Scott Jacobson)
   4. Re: Backup Network drives (bob944)
   5. exam-250-365 (MPITSO, TSHEPO)
   6. Re: looking for x64 NBU 5.1 Client (WEAVER, Simon (external))
   7. Command Line for Master Server Properties (Randy Samora)
   8. Re: NBU - Subject Topic Context (Jeff Lightner)
   9. netbackup version 5.0 (nizar motasim)
  10. Re: Command Line for Master Server Properties (Jeff Lightner)
  11. Re: Command Line for Master Server Properties (Randy Samora)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 15:28:04 -0600
From: Jeff Cleverley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] TIR files on 6.5.1
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Greetings,

I just wanted to verify something with regards to TIR files.  I think I
may have some corrupt files that are helping create larger than expected
image catalog files.  We normally run a full backup on Friday.  My plan
is to get rid of the old TIR files and let the full backup create a new
file.  I believe I did this in the past, but don't remember since it has
been at least 5 years since I did it.  I shouldn't need to do anything
other than delete or move the /usr/openv/netbackup/tir_info directory on
the clients correct?

I had previously posted about why the catalog images for our hpux
servers were so large.  I haven't heard anything back from a support
call I opened but I did decide to find out if the compress was working
and how old the files were when it started compressing them.  I found
nothing was compressed.  I then found that it is looking for
/usr/bin/compress which did not get put on this new build (RHEL4.5).  I
was able to get compress/uncompress on the server and it did compress
and saved quite a bit of space.  At least the file system should not
fill up.  The image directories are still more than 3x larger than the
old 5.0 server which is why I'm thinking the TIR files may be hosed up.

Thanks,

Jeff

-- 

Jeff Cleverley
Unix Systems Administrator
4380 Ziegler Road
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
970-288-4611
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080520/
3d3199cc/attachment.htm

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 20:34:41 -0600
From: "Nathan Kippen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] replacing ndmp drives in SSO configuration
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I have 4 drives that I was using for NDMP.  These 4 drives were shared
with other media servers.  I removed the drives temporarily because I
was having some problems with NDMP -- but now when re-adding them back
in as ndmp drives I get the following error: "drive name already in
use."  I only get the error when trying to add the drive to my SSO
configuration as an ndmp drive.  I've tried doing the tpautoconf
-replace_drive drive_name -path path_name ... and I've tried doing the
tpautoconf -report_disc on each of my media servers but I haven't had
much luck in resolving the "drive name already in use" error.  This
error occurs after clicking the OK button in the 'Add New drive" window.
I've opened up a ticket with symantec but it has been two weeks and
still no solution.

Thanks,

NBU 6.0 MP5
HP-UX 11.23 IA (Master)
HP-UX 11.23 PA (Media server that talks to NDMP host) EMC Celerra - NAS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080520/
e07ac6e6/attachment.html

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 23:12:28 -0600
From: "Scott Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU - Subject Topic Context
To: "nbu" <VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Forum,

With so many good and critical topics discussed in this invaluable
forum, I'd like to propose a suggestion to the forum in returning to a
Veritas version level description in the e-mail  "subject" area first,
which could help each of us determine, in part, if we wish to open,
review and respond in support.

Most of us can breeze through current e-mail's by topic and decide to
read it or not.

For some who are focused in the 5.x, 6.0 to 6.5x upgrade process, I've
unexpectedly found good information in e-mail's whose subject
descriptions don't reference anything to do with the issues or problems
in the 6.x upgrade process.

This suggestion may also be helpful as we migrate through the  6.5.x +
releases/patches in the upcoming year(s).

My suggestion is certainly not limited to my area of focus, but perhaps
for any of us who may want to first qualify their primary question or
issue based their current running version level 1st, and the issue 2nd.

I just recall this being a "norm" 4+ years ago.

Maybe long term member's like Ed, Simon and Justin or others, including
the WEB Master can chime in and correct my assumptions on forum
protocol.

Thanks,
Scott J.




------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 03:08:18 -0400
From: "bob944" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Network drives
To: <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"

> I'm adding a Windows backup policy and the network drives do not show 
> up as a selection in the file list. I have checked the "backup network

> drives" on the attributes list.
> 
>  What am I missing?

Research?

What are your questions after reading the NetBackup System
Administrator's Guide, Volume 1, section titled "Backup network drives?"




------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:17:47 +0200
From: "MPITSO, TSHEPO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] exam-250-365
To: <VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu>,
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID:
        
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi all

 

Have any one toke the 250-365 (6.5) exam, I need tips and resources that
I can use to pass the exam.

 

Regards,

 

Tshepo Mpitso

System Backup Administrator

Gauteng Shared Services Centre (GSSC)

Technology Support Services (TSS)

Tel. (011) 689 8716

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

web:www.gssc.gpg.gov.za

 

 


Disclaimer:
 
This message may contain confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should
not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the
sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake
and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be
guaranteed to be secured or error-free as information could be
intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or
contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any
errors or omissions in the content of this message, which arise as a
result of e-mail transmission. The Gauteng Provincial Government does
not take responsibility for Gauteng Provincial Government users'
personal views. Gauteng Provincial Government services available online
at: www.gautengonline.gov.za
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080521/
e30496e4/attachment.htm

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:55:22 +0100
From: "WEAVER, Simon \(external\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] looking for x64 NBU 5.1 Client
To: "Jeff Lightner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,        "Dave Carpe"
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


Well it looks like I am stuffed, as the client now wants a Media Server
as well as client based, and the compatability for 5.1 does not list
it!! only as a client!
 
So doomed from the start !
 
Simon

________________________________

From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 4:54 PM
To: Dave Carpe; WEAVER, Simon (external);
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] looking for x64 NBU 5.1 Client



As it turns out from Simon's response x86_64 was not correct because he
wasn't talking about Linux but rather Windows.

 

Here we're not doing any 64 bit Windows yet so unfortunately I can't
answer.  

 

The fact that the 32 bit client for Linux can be made to work on 64 bit
Linux suggests there is likely a way to do it on Windows so long as it
has some sort of backwards compatibility like Linux does by installing
libraries for that purpose.  At least we know hardware isn't the
limitation so if it doesn't work it would be the OS.

 

________________________________

From: Dave Carpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 11:44 AM
To: Jeff Lightner; WEAVER, Simon (external);
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] looking for x64 NBU 5.1 Client

 

Linux on x64 is referring to the AMD Opteron and Intel EM-64T
processors, so x86_64 would be correct.

 

Itanuium needs a completely different version and is 64 bit only.

 

David K. Carpe

Principal Systems Engineer

Symantec Corporation

Office: 646.487.6012 

Mobile: 908.963.6818

Home Office: 973.940-1805

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Lightner
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 10:51 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] looking for x64 NBU 5.1 Client

 

What do you mean by "x64".  Linux x86_64?  Itanium?  Something else?

 

If it is Linux x86_64 bit you can install the 2.4 kernel client (32 bit)
and add compatibility libraries to make it work properly.

 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 10:26 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] looking for x64 NBU 5.1 Client

 

All 
Although I have managed to find 5.1 MP5 for x64, I cannot find a client.


I have an x64 on CD, but I am getting alot of problems with the volume
manager service refusing to start. 

Is there a way to get the software, without the need to contact
Symantec? 

Thanks, Si 

This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from
disclosure.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use
it
for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this
message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and
all
liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or
falsified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
REGISTERED OFFICE:-
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England

----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or
confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic
transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you
have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------



This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from
disclosure.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use
it
for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this
message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and
all
liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or
falsified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
REGISTERED OFFICE:-
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080521/
5710e6ff/attachment.html

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 08:27:53 -0500
From: "Randy Samora" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Command Line for Master Server Properties
To: <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID:
        
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I'm a GUI GUY but I'm trying to help a friend troubleshoot his NBU
setup.  He made a change in the Master Server properties for VSP but
then all of his jobs ran 2 or 3 times last night even though they were
successful.  Immediately I thought "Frequency" but his policy is set for
a 4 day Frequency.  I want him to send me the Master Server Properties
setting and the only way for him to send it to me is in a text file.
What is the command line that will pipe that information for me?

 

Thanks,

Randy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080521/
b2c4f08b/attachment.htm

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:36:59 -0400
From: "Jeff Lightner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU - Subject Topic Context
To: "Scott Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,       "nbu"
        <VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="US-ASCII"

I doubt you'll get much out of this proposal:
1)  Some of the posts come from a on line forum.
2)  You'll always have newbies who don't know the rules.
3)  Sometimes the subject line is most relevant to the subject if a bit
lengthy and added details that could be put in the body in the subject
would simply make it too long.
4)  The point in this list isn't just to offer tips to others but to ask
questions hopefully with an eye to getting them answered.   Given that
it seems reasonable subscribers should open all messages to see if they
can offer the assistance requested rather than simply choose to read the
ones they think will help themselves.
5)  Why limit it to version? Why not platform (Windows 32 bit, Windows
64 bit, Windows XP, Windows NT version, Windows 2000, Windows 2003,
UNIX:  Solaris 8, 9, 10, OpenSolaris, FreeBSD, HP-UX 11.0, 11.11, 11.23,
AIX...
6)  Some folks are just contrary. :-)

The deal is there is a lot of information that may or may not be
relevant to the question asked.  Ideally the user is including that in
their post.  If not one can question (as I did yesterday on the question
about x64).

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Jacobson
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 1:12 AM
To: nbu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU - Subject Topic Context

Forum,

With so many good and critical topics discussed in this invaluable
forum, I'd like to propose a suggestion
to the forum in returning to a Veritas version level description in the
e-mail  "subject" area first, which could
help each of us determine, in part, if we wish to open, review and
respond in support.

Most of us can breeze through current e-mail's by topic and decide to
read it or not.

For some who are focused in the 5.x, 6.0 to 6.5x upgrade process, I've
unexpectedly
found good information in e-mail's whose subject descriptions don't
reference 
anything to do with the issues or problems in the 6.x upgrade process.

This suggestion may also be helpful as we migrate through the  6.5.x +
releases/patches
in the upcoming year(s).

My suggestion is certainly not limited to my area of focus, but perhaps
for any of us who
may want to first qualify their primary question or issue based their
current running 
version level 1st, and the issue 2nd.

I just recall this being a "norm" 4+ years ago.

Maybe long term member's like Ed, Simon and Justin or others, including
the WEB Master can chime in
and correct my assumptions on forum protocol.

Thanks,
Scott J.


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or
confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic
transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you
have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------



------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 16:38:01 +0300
From: nizar motasim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup version 5.0
To: <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256"


Dear's
 
I have veritas netbackup version 5.0 and I have data on windows 2003 R2
,I installed client on this server but no backup complete and also it
hanging and not let other backup to complete (there are with windows
2000).please help .
TQ
_________________________________________________________________
Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live
Spaces. It's easy!
http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.a
spx&mkt=en-us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080521/
6934181c/attachment.html

------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:46:22 -0400
From: "Jeff Lightner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command Line for Master Server Properties
To: "Randy Samora" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

What kind of client?

 

On UNIX/Linux all the policy information is under
<installpath>/netbackup/db/class/<policyname>.   The files there are
ascii text.   He could send those to you.

 

Also not sure why you're saying he can only send "text".  Some mail
filters complain about things that don't have a .txt suffix but you can
add that to anything.  One thing you could do is pull up the information
in the GUI (on Windows).  Do a Ctrl-Print Screen then paste it into a
MS-Word DOC and mail that.  If the mail filter blocked .doc files he
could simply at .txt to the end of the name of the attachment.

 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy
Samora
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 9:28 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Command Line for Master Server Properties

 

I'm a GUI GUY but I'm trying to help a friend troubleshoot his NBU
setup.  He made a change in the Master Server properties for VSP but
then all of his jobs ran 2 or 3 times last night even though they were
successful.  Immediately I thought "Frequency" but his policy is set for
a 4 day Frequency.  I want him to send me the Master Server Properties
setting and the only way for him to send it to me is in a text file.
What is the command line that will pipe that information for me?

 

Thanks,

Randy
----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or
confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic
transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you
have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080521/
27683cb4/attachment.htm

------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 08:49:26 -0500
From: "Randy Samora" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Command Line for Master Server Properties
To: "Jeff Lightner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID:
        
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Windows environment and I meant I wasn't able to rdp or remotely login
and take a look.  I wanted him to pipe the results to a txt file and
email them to me.  I thought about screen shots but there are so many
tabs I thought that would take a while.

 

From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 8:46 AM
To: Randy Samora; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command Line for Master Server Properties

 

What kind of client?

 

On UNIX/Linux all the policy information is under
<installpath>/netbackup/db/class/<policyname>.   The files there are
ascii text.   He could send those to you.

 

Also not sure why you're saying he can only send "text".  Some mail
filters complain about things that don't have a .txt suffix but you can
add that to anything.  One thing you could do is pull up the information
in the GUI (on Windows).  Do a Ctrl-Print Screen then paste it into a
MS-Word DOC and mail that.  If the mail filter blocked .doc files he
could simply at .txt to the end of the name of the attachment.

 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy
Samora
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 9:28 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Command Line for Master Server Properties

 

I'm a GUI GUY but I'm trying to help a friend troubleshoot his NBU
setup.  He made a change in the Master Server properties for VSP but
then all of his jobs ran 2 or 3 times last night even though they were
successful.  Immediately I thought "Frequency" but his policy is set for
a 4 day Frequency.  I want him to send me the Master Server Properties
setting and the only way for him to send it to me is in a text file.
What is the command line that will pipe that information for me?

 

Thanks,

Randy

----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or
confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic
transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you
have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080521/
9a2b5023/attachment.html

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


End of Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 25, Issue 43
******************************************

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Reply via email to