Re: [Veritas-ha] SF/HA 5.0 on Solaris 9: "HAD Self Check" error

2007-11-13 Thread Manuel Braun
Hi Marianne, Could you please post the "/etc/llttab" file and the MultiNICB/IPMultiNICB resource config. Thanks Manuel From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marianne Van Den Berg Sent: 13 November 2007 19:17 To: veritas-ha@mailman.en

Re: [Veritas-ha] Veritas-ha Digest, Vol 19, Issue 16

2007-11-13 Thread Scarbrough, Brian P
\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ - / / \ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs> -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/

Re: [Veritas-ha] SF/HA 5.0 on Solaris 9: "HAD Self Check" error

2007-11-13 Thread Marianne Van Den Berg
Brand new systems: Sun Fire V245 Servers, 2 Ultra Sparc IIIi 1.5Ghz CPU, 2Gb DDR-1 SDRAM Only O/S and SF/HA loaded. I recently presented vcs 5.0 training in Israel on little single-cpu blades with 1Gb memory, clustering 2 Oracle instances. It was dog slow but no errors Only difference w

Re: [Veritas-ha] SF/HA 5.0 on Solaris 9: "HAD Self Check" error

2007-11-13 Thread Jim Senicka
Sorry Randy, that was not a case of saying "dunno". HAD not heartbeating GAB is usually indicative of a system load issue or something blocking the ability of HAD to open necessary lock files. These are general statements as this can happen on any environment and should be easy to track down. Spec

Re: [Veritas-ha] SF/HA 5.0 on Solaris 9: "HAD Self Check" error

2007-11-13 Thread Randy Slead
I have seen this on all version of VCS (4/5) even at 10% system utilization. And Symantec going "I dunno", is not helpful. Jim Senicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Marianne Stationery HAD is not talking to GAB. Excessive system utilization, or a blocked /var file system or some such issue.

Re: [Veritas-ha] SF/HA 5.0 on Solaris 9: "HAD Self Check" error

2007-11-13 Thread Jim Senicka
HAD is not talking to GAB. Excessive system utilization, or a blocked /var file system or some such issue. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marianne Van Den Berg Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:17 PM To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.au

[Veritas-ha] SF/HA 5.0 on Solaris 9: "HAD Self Check" error

2007-11-13 Thread Marianne Van Den Berg
Hi all Brand new installation - 2-node cluster, Solaris 9 with latest O/S patches, SF/HA 5.0 with MP1. IPMultiNICB config'ed as parallel sg (using mpathd) and ClusterService group. Getting these errors about 3 minutes after hastart. Any ideas?? /var/adm/messages: Nov 13 15:59:11 drp-db-

Re: [Veritas-ha] Minimum size for coordinator LUNs VCS 5.0

2007-11-13 Thread Manuel Braun
The coordinator LUNs size should be greater than 22MB to overcome potential Array / Array Support Library (ASL) issues. Regards Manuel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Clarke Sent: 13 November 2007 08:34 To: Veritas HA Subject: [Veri