Since I seem to be about the only windows user of vcs in the world ;-) I
wonder a bit about this - I was under the impression this was not
recommended practice in a windows VCS environment, but it would be
supported according to these mails?
/a
Sent from a p990i
Reply Header _
LLT does support Layer 2 link aggregation and can work over
trunks/bonds/aggregated links as long as a single device is presented to it:
Linux - Bonding
Solaris - Sun Trunking (now link aggregation/dladm in Solaris 10)
HPUX - Auto Port Aggregation
AIX - Etherchannel
IPMP is at Layer 3 and Bondin
Hello all!
Only WAC now ensures communication between clusters. But it is not always
good. If WAC is broken it is still possible to use heartbeats (through
SRDF ping or steward) but there is no other ways of starting service
groups on remote cluster. I don't mean Auto failover option betwee
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 06:04:38 John Cronin wrote:
> Getting slightly off topic, but still somewhat relevant.
>
> Linux has many flavors of Ethernet bonding. To be sure, link aggregation
> resulting in increased bandwidth is generally supported on a single switch.
> However, Linux does have an a
On Thursday 07 May 2009 14:11:02 John Cronin wrote:
> On thing to consider - don't you want to know when you lose a heartbeat
> link? I know the lost link will be noted in /var/log/messages or wherever
> your syslog configuration indicates, but I would want it in my VCS logs
> somewhere too.
Of c
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 05:27:00 Hudes, Dana wrote:
> I don't care what tricks Linux plays or what they call it. From a
> network perspective, true bonding requires connection to the same
> switch/router and is done at the link layer. You don't have 2 IP
> interfaces, you have one. The bits go out
