btw. that isn't to say that for the stuff I do in SVN (which is most
at the moment) I dislike Versions whilst using it. Versions remains my
preferred client on the Mac.
On May 11, 3:46 pm, Marijn wrote:
> I'm just moving to git with gity. Works like a charm :)
>
> Too bad though...
>
> On May 8,
I'm just moving to git with gity. Works like a charm :)
Too bad though...
On May 8, 10:24 pm, Cue wrote:
> Merge seems to be too much to ask for on a mac os these days. :(
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Versions" group.
> To post to this gr
SmartSVN does it on Mac too. You get used to the clunky java interface after a
while.
Paul
On 10 May 2010, at 02:05, Matthew Alan Young wrote:
> i'll have to try that out... rather use versions (hint hint HINT) but you all
> know eclipse does merges right? I just hate clunky eclipse.
>
> On M
i'll have to try that out... rather use versions (hint hint HINT) but you all
know eclipse does merges right? I just hate clunky eclipse.
On May 9, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Rob Rye wrote:
> If it is still available, Zigversion handled merge fine for me. I miss it.
> The last stable version (1.2.3) was
If it is still available, Zigversion handled merge fine for me. I miss it. The
last stable version (1.2.3) was built against svn 1.4.x and svn 1.5.x, if
memory serves. I had long thought of it as abandon-ware. However, the developer
put up a pre-release of version 1.3 in December that worked wit
Merge seems to be too much to ask for on a mac os these days. :(
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
versions+unsubscr...@goog
merge is really all I want...
and maybe a versions for git =-)
On May 5, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Lance Haysom wrote:
> I find quicker replies come from emailing support direct...
>
>
> On 6/05/2010, at 6:58 AM, TheDO wrote:
>
>>
>> Two weeks. no response to this message, and it's still on the fron
HI Lance,
Thanks for pointing that out, very true. :)
Some additional clarification, to help everyone set their
expectations:
- We actively monitor our support inbox and make sure we get back to
emails sent there as soon as possible.
- We try to keep tabs on the group, but if you need/expect a r
I find quicker replies come from emailing support direct...
On 6/05/2010, at 6:58 AM, TheDO wrote:
Two weeks. no response to this message, and it's still on the front
page of the Versions Google Group is Versions really that hurting
for a bustling user base?
On Apr 22, 8:11 pm, TheDO
Two weeks. no response to this message, and it's still on the front
page of the Versions Google Group is Versions really that hurting
for a bustling user base?
On Apr 22, 8:11 pm, TheDO wrote:
> I'm not sure how well Versions is performing for the parent companies
> as a revenue-generating
I'm not sure how well Versions is performing for the parent companies
as a revenue-generating product, nor am I asking, but I do wonder if a
lack of revenue from licenses is resulting in the slow update
schedule. It seems to take weeks for simple little fixes to be
incorporated into the application
11 matches
Mail list logo
