Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video Content Provider Rights

2009-03-30 Thread Michael Sullivan
I still think their needs to be a standardized whitelist/blacklist for 3rd party services that want to use content on their advertiser supported site. If nothing is defined (in feed or page) then by default any site is whitelisted. If a content creator wants more granular control over where their

[videoblogging] Video blogging history/evolution

2009-03-30 Thread gintaras.miskinis
Hello, First of all I would like to apologize for my English, which is not very good. Secondly, I would like to introduce myself: I am a student from Lithuania (Europe), my name is Gintaras (in English - "amberman" ;D). I am a final course student at Vilnius University, communication faculty and

Re: [videoblogging] Video Content Provider Rights

2009-03-30 Thread Rupert
If you're talking about someone stealing content, and contravening your copyright/CC licence, that's one thing. But if you're just talking about someone like YouTube making $x billion from paid advertising on content made by users who don't get a fair share of that, obviously there's little

[videoblogging] Re: Video Content Provider Rights

2009-03-30 Thread Steve Watkins
How long ago did mefeedia get polluted with ad overload, and was it discussed on this list at all? Anybody know if there have been any more legal cases related to creative commons that get us any further along the road of working out what counts as 'commercial use'? For video aggregation & sea

Re: [videoblogging] Video Content Provider Rights

2009-03-30 Thread Michael Sullivan
Hi Sheila. Could you ellaborate? Are you referring to aggregator sites like mefeedia.com who bombard visitors with ads wrapped around everyones videos or are you referring to hosting sites like youtube? Sull On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Sheila English wrote: > I'm looking for feedback on

[videoblogging] New Open Source Video editor

2009-03-30 Thread Jay dedman
We've spoken here about how bad most of the Open Source video editors currently have been. Usually it's just weird UI that makes it difficult to use. Here's a new project that really looks promising: http://www.pitivi.org This statement makes it clear the developers might understand creators: http

Re: [videoblogging] Video Content Provider Rights

2009-03-30 Thread Jay dedman
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Roxanne Darling wrote: > This is an issue that has been discussed (and ranted) here many times. Short > of forming a guild - which was under discussion years ago and for which I am > partly responsible for dropping the ball in) I don't see that any of us as > indiv

[videoblogging] Video Search Engine

2009-03-30 Thread Adam Warner
http://www.owaks.com/ Adam W. Warner [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]