I still think their needs to be a standardized whitelist/blacklist for 3rd
party services that want to use content on their advertiser supported site.
If nothing is defined (in feed or page) then by default any site is
whitelisted. If a content creator wants more granular control over where
their
Hello,
First of all I would like to apologize for my English, which is not very
good. Secondly, I would like to introduce myself: I am a student from
Lithuania (Europe), my name is Gintaras (in English - "amberman" ;D).
I am a final course student at Vilnius University, communication faculty
and
If you're talking about someone stealing content, and contravening
your copyright/CC licence, that's one thing.
But if you're just talking about someone like YouTube making $x
billion from paid advertising on content made by users who don't get a
fair share of that, obviously there's little
How long ago did mefeedia get polluted with ad overload, and was it discussed
on this list at all?
Anybody know if there have been any more legal cases related to creative
commons that get us any further along the road of working out what counts as
'commercial use'?
For video aggregation & sea
Hi Sheila.
Could you ellaborate?
Are you referring to aggregator sites like mefeedia.com who bombard visitors
with ads wrapped around everyones videos or are you referring to hosting
sites like youtube?
Sull
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Sheila English wrote:
> I'm looking for feedback on
We've spoken here about how bad most of the Open Source video editors
currently have been. Usually it's just weird UI that makes it difficult to
use.
Here's a new project that really looks promising: http://www.pitivi.org
This statement makes it clear the developers might understand creators:
http
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Roxanne Darling wrote:
> This is an issue that has been discussed (and ranted) here many times. Short
> of forming a guild - which was under discussion years ago and for which I am
> partly responsible for dropping the ball in) I don't see that any of us as
> indiv
http://www.owaks.com/
Adam W. Warner
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]