Re: [videoblogging] Re: Threats To Security, Or Freedom?

Steve: "...one unwritten safeguard against the internet being switched off is the amount of business & commerce that goes on. This ensures that the government are unlikely to take a decision to switch it off lightly..." Steve: Respectfully, you are mistaken. The only element to "ensure" proper a

Re: [videoblogging] Re: HTML5 Webinar tomorrow

It uses iframe to do the html5, like this plug in.. but doesn't youtube also auto-adapt to client? http://www.clickonf5.org/internet/iframe-and-flash-embed-code-supporting-html5-for-youtube-compared/8517

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Threats To Security, Or Freedom?

I believe this bill is about just what it says it is, ensuring in a worst possible scenario that federal government services continue to function. Just as you might want make a plan to unplug your home network and have some alternative method of communicating with your family & friends if you we

[videoblogging] Re: Threats To Security, Or Freedom?

Also worth remembering that one unwritten safeguard against the internet being switched off is the amount of business & commerce that goes on. This ensures that the government are unlikely to take a decision to switch it off lightly, due to the economic implications. Depending on the situation

[videoblogging] Re: HTML5 Webinar tomorrow

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman wrote: > > > Great news! Vimeo came out with a universal player for embeds. > So what did Vimeo to allow this? Im confused why everyone (youtube. > blip, etc) doesnt have players and codecs that work everywhere. Whats > the secret sauce? > > Jay