If you are in easy driving range of Huntsville, AL and can do indoor
video I'd like to hear from you for a project I am working on. Please
contact me off list to discuss.
/r
I came across this through an OT post on a totally unrelated mailing
list, but I think it may be of interest to some of you.
Their activity is
...based on the conviction that open media - vibrant, pluralistic,
independent, and arising from within communities themselves - are the
cornerstone of
I have to be perfectly blunt with you: Get over it. It's $30 each time and
it's not like they release a new version very often. You pay to upgrade
every other piece of commercial software also.
I didn't mind the bluntness :) I have paid for QT Pro at least three times.
In the PC world, this
On 7/11/07, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not to mention that if you do let one expire real people who would use
the domain likely cant get them as they are scooped up automatically by the
registrars themselves or through a deal with a 3rd party company.
Yeah, this is totally
H264 has sure had a lot of buzz about it everywhere. I wonder if one
of you can answer a few questions I have. I've looked around on the
web and googled but I'm not fining the answers.
1) I have Adobe Premiere Elements and it outputs h264. When I tried it
though, the bitrates, unlike the other
Andreas,
Thanks for taking the time:
Use Quicktime Pro where you can type in your own bitrate.
Bitrate is adjustable in PE as well, it's just that the settings are
so high I was very surprised. I have QT pro (maybe not the most recent
though) and maybe that's why stuff is weird. I'll take a
Thanks Adrian,
I have purchased QT pro twice, I probably only have v6 at the moment,
I'll take a look. I did feel it was kind of extortion, though,
especially the fact that there's no upgrade path AFAIK, only pay the
same price as other losers that are first time buyers.
From the rest of what
behaviour - and it makes me sad. Whoever you are, if you're reading
this... you're probably smiling and sneering. I don't really care.
I don't expect to appeal to your better nature. But what you're
Rupert, for what it's worth, I doubt these are ordinary people doing
this but more spammer
On 7/10/07, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do a videoblog for an IP lawyer. He says it's about $350 to file the
paperwork, and about $2000 to get the attorney to do the legwork/trademark
search, which is needed before you file. Only you can decide if it's worth
it to you.
This is
Although the subject of Asterisk TV may not be of interest, you can
look at how the Mogulus technology is working here:
http://asterisktv.com which is a mixed bag of short humorous videos,
promos made for the channel which opens with a live show on Friday,
and the usual conference footage
This is a PITA, but with an added step in the workflow (the last step,
usually), you can use a format converter to adjust the size. There are
many of these for Windoze, but I'm not sure what can do this on a Mac.
Doesn't handbrake or hub do this? No, a quick look at hb shows it'll
do a lot but
I just can't believe that setting the frame size of a project is a pro
feature. I mean ... that's SERIOUSLY messed up. A $300 editor should be
able to set the frame size for Pete's sake.
I couldn't agree more. All the free software I have and the
entry-level Premiere elements all allow this.
I was just about to log in to a show when I saw, on the front page, a
male pleasuring himself live. This is bad news for O11, I hope they
get it straightened out.
/r
On 7/2/07, Jonathan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's hooked into my mac using the mic input and I've tried turning up the
input volume and the gain.
The microphone is a TAKY UDM-606L
Ah, I learned the hard way, if this is a MacBook the input is line
level, a mic won't drive it. A PC headset
Someone did a live video stream via mogulus in Soho, NYC:
http://iphonelaunch.tv/
On 6/30/07, Len Edgerly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Man oh man this was fun. I ended up being first in line when I showed
up at the Cambridge, Mass., Apple store at 3 a.m. today. Here's the
video I shot when the
Actually, you make a pretty decent preface there for the argument that
*sales* sites should pay more for access because they make money,
whereas the blogs, vlogs, and schlogs, hobby sites, free radio and
video, etc etc should always have reliable, broadband, free access on
solid peered networks.
On 6/29/07, Brian Richardson - WhatTheCast? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um, I think people should just pay for a service. More bandwidth costs
more money, less bandwidth is cheaper. Trying to figure out how much to
charge by content instead of usage is ... well, there's no polite way to
say it
You're into video, because you're on this list. Are you interested in
voip? Have you heard of asterisk? Are you available for a couple of
hours next week?
I need someone who's ready to try to be co-host or at least
correspondent for live video about voip, specifically asterisk, the
open source
Hi John,
Thanks for posting that, it's very interesting. I know a little about
a few of those sites.
I've been using Brightcove since the end of 2006. Their network is
excellent and they provide all kinds of players including this one:
http://wine-stories.com - some of their players can have
Hi Ron,
I'm just guessing here that at least during beta they won't respond
quickly, although I did get an answer when the server was down for
awhile and I asked about that. I'm guessing the preferred format is
FLV, but they do MOV and I think even WMV. No MV4 though.
On 6/28/07, Ron Watson
Great idea, Jeff.
On 6/26/07, Jeff Pulver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Announcing The Everyday Heroes Project: (A Summer Project for New
Media Enthusiasts)
On 6/25/07, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried to access mogulus feeds from two macs now (both Intel, so maybe
that's it) and it still crashes any browser. Wonder what's up.
Brook, I'm using a MacBook (not pro) with 1 gig RAM and FF 2.0.0.4
with no problems. The server connection
On a wild web search for peanuts and airlines that have banned them, I
somehow ended up here:
http://www.consumeraffairs.com/
You'll notice they have some kind of submit your video program (they
use Brightcove I see) and I thought it may be of interest to some of
you here. I have nothing to do
Hi,
I bought a Canon Optura S1 last year and other than this one thing, I
think it's great for my uses. I like the auto-backup aspect of tape
(at least for a year or more before the actual tape begins degrading)
and also the non compressed video. This camera actually does decent
stills for the
Interesting device, thanks for the review. Two questions: does a TV
cable come with it and is this the same as the video iPod connector by
any chance?
On 6/16/07, Lisa Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I posted an amateur review of the Flip Video camera from Pure Digital here.
This camera just
http://www.blogtv.com/Shows/787
I have an hour in front of me where I'll be on live from Paris. Come
and co-host if you're awake! Free espresso for all.
r
On 6/11/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway...I encourage you to join our email list of you want to help us
collect video..or lead the way on remixing:
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalvideo
Amazing effort, thanks for this! I'll post it where I think people
will most
On 6/13/07, randulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amazing effort, thanks for this! I'll post it where I think people
will most enjoy it. Or *not* enjoy it ;)
Not sure what I did, but I was referring to the Dubya archive. Sorry
for the mis-post!
Hi,
I've been lurking for a bit and wanted to ask you if some of you would
like to participate in a live podcast that covers various aspects of
your video interests? We could do this weekly or monthly or whenever.
Although what I'm proposing is audio, many people use ustream or
stickam to
29 matches
Mail list logo
