Re: [videoblogging] Radio article on legality of photographing in public in UK

2009-02-19 Thread Michael Sullivan
vague = power On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Rupert wrote: > This week, the Counterterrorism Act came into effect, which makes it > illegal to document the activities of anybody who is or has ever been > a member of the armed forces, the intelligence services or the > police, in a way that m

Re: [videoblogging] Radio article on legality of photographing in public in UK

2009-02-18 Thread Rupert
This week, the Counterterrorism Act came into effect, which makes it illegal to document the activities of anybody who is or has ever been a member of the armed forces, the intelligence services or the police, in a way that might be useful to terrorists. This deliberate vagueness gives the p

[videoblogging] Radio article on legality of photographing in public in UK

2009-02-11 Thread ruperthowe
There's a short but interesting piece on the BBC's Law In Action about whether the police have any right to stop you taking photographs in public in the UK, in light of various cases where the police have done this. The answer is, basically, that they have to suspect criminal or terrorist intent,