blogosphere but tablet afficianados) is a great
> > place to start looking for reviews on devices like this. I've watched at
> > least 3 unboxings or full out reviews of the N800 this week and last week,
> > so if you need some help locating some videos let me know. The video
>
2007 2:49 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: [video_vertigo] iPhone
Robyn and Tim,
You're blowing me away with your crazy knowledge of these devices. I bow to
your superiority on the subject. For mine is merely anecdotal.
That said, without my superior techn
On 1/15/07, Harold Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not laughing, Mike. I believe the Zune has some potential, especially
> considering it's *half the price* of the the iPhone. It may even be a
> third
> of the price by the time the iPhone is actually shipped. So considering
> the
> pr
look at the LG KE850:
> http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/13/video-of-lgs-ke850-its-no-poser/
>
>
>
> Robyn
>
>
>
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 4:30 PM
> To: videoblog
Add me (anyone who wants to): haroldjohnson for Skype and voyagerradio for
iChat
By the way, I caught your tongue-in-cheek.
Harold
On 1/15/07, T Shey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I actually played with the N800 over the weekend at the Nokia store.
> Its built-in videoconferencing over Googl
I'm not laughing, Mike. I believe the Zune has some potential, especially
considering it's *half the price* of the the iPhone. It may even be a third
of the price by the time the iPhone is actually shipped. So considering the
price point, the Zune packs somewhat of a punch over its competitors.
: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of T Shey
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 11:53 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: [video_vertigo] iPhone
I actually played with the N800 over the weekend at the Nokia store.
Its built-in videoco
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 4:30 PM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: [video_vertigo] iPhone
>
>
>
> A friend of mine bought the N770... that's the small handheld tablet
> de
oser/
Robyn
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 4:30 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: [video_vertigo] iPhone
A friend of mine bought the N770... that's the s
A friend of mine bought the N770... that's the small handheld tablet
device that runs a form of debian linux right? I don't think it
panned out for him... ended up in a drawer like most such devices.
I'll have to check out the specs on the N800 and see what's new.
The only problem I think it ha
Hey, just caught up with this thread... for the record, tongue was
firmly planted in cheek when talking about Apple being arrogant.
Sure they are, but who can't like seeing Apple give a jolt to a mobile
phone business that seems to conspire together to tolerate bad user
experience.
There was one
lol whoa yeah it does look like Cisco might have blown it, har har
sticking a sticker that says 'iPhone' on the box of an existing
product, does not seem likely to me to have preserved their trademark,
fools!
Cheers
Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Ryan Ozawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On 1/11/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Oh yeah and the supreme arrongance of Apple winds me up - just why did
> they think they could get away with using the name iPhone when its
> already been trademarked?
I'm an Apple fan, but also felt the same way. It seemed so blatant,
beautiful, have I mentioned the best? Etc.
> -
> I just have this urge to go and buy Windows Vista.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> ]
> > On Behalf Of Gromik Tohoku
> > Sent:
Etc. -
I just have this urge to go and buy Windows Vista.
> -Original Message-
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Gromik Tohoku
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 11:50 AM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [videoblogging]
Oh yeah and the supreme arrongance of Apple winds me up - just why did
they think they could get away with using the name iPhone when its
already been trademarked? Cisco are taking them to court over this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6250511.stm
Whats plan B, change the name to podphone?
I think I may be missing something, not understanding the level of
innovation people are attaching to the iPhone.
The user interface seems real nice, and the multi-touch display is
innovative (I assume the starting point for it was the 2 finger stuff
you can do on macbook trackpads). But a lot of
In considering the term revolutionary... and the much better term
innovation...
I think one must compare the new iPhone to microsoft's "ipod killer" the
zune...
... and laugh and laugh and laugh.
The ONLY innovation Microsoft made over the iPod after 100% nocking it
off... oh wait... they made t
without quoting timshey out of proportion,
>On 1/9/07, T Shey <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> wrote:
> To me, it just shows how arrogant Apple has become.
I would like to comment that instead of concidering
Apple as "arrogant" may looking at how Apple is
revolutionising the industry, might be a better
in
On 1/9/07, T Shey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To me, it just shows how arrogant Apple has become.
>
> For over a decade now, thousands of people in the mobile business have
> been putting out hundreds of variations on the mobile phone that were
> dependable for being mediocre, baffling to use, and
Ryanne and I did a quick video about the iPhone and Apple TV as they relate
to videoblogging:
http://www.freevlog.org/index.php/2007/01/09/iphone-apple-tv-first-look/
-Verdi
On 1/10/07, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> While viewing the rotation iPhone in it's case I asked a Apple rep.
> ne
While viewing the rotation iPhone in it's case I asked a Apple rep.
next to me if there'll be a development system for developers writing
apps to the iPhone. She said to contact apple to do that.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Either w
long compile times? ;)
On Jan 10, 2007, at 9:24 AM, Digital Buddha wrote:
> why does it need to be a "young" hacker? ;)
>
> On 1/9/07, Joshua Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Either way, I'm sure some enterprising young hacker will find a way
> > to install apps onto it.
> >
>
> Ma
why does it need to be a "young" hacker? ;)
On 1/9/07, Joshua Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Either way, I'm sure some enterprising young hacker will find a way
> to install apps onto it.
>
> If it syncs with iTunes, then at the very least RSS is available to
> it (via sync). I'm going to a
Either way, I'm sure some enterprising young hacker will find a way
to install apps onto it.
If it syncs with iTunes, then at the very least RSS is available to
it (via sync). I'm going to assume QuickTime is implemented at some
level, too. Plus, if Safari is full-featured, then that opens
Hi,
Why did apple only put in 2 megapixels in the iphone's camera?
Rodli
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Meiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 1/9/07, David King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You said "Why should it be teathered to one desktop computer with a
> > sync cab
To me, it just shows how arrogant Apple has become.
For over a decade now, thousands of people in the mobile business have
been putting out hundreds of variations on the mobile phone that were
dependable for being mediocre, baffling to use, and ultimately
unsatisfying for the customer.
For every
On 1/9/07, David King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You said "Why should it be teathered to one desktop computer with a
> sync cable."
>
> That one's easy - it's so Apple can sell TWO things... :-)
>
> David
Precicely, Apple's "digital hub" strategy. :)
But if they don't cut the umbilical cord
You said "Why should it be teathered to one desktop computer with a
sync cable."
That one's easy - it's so Apple can sell TWO things... :-)
David
On 1/9/07, Mike Meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ha, I'm here.
>
> I just have so much to say I don't even know where to begin.
>
> Mostly I'm
Ha, I'm here.
I just have so much to say I don't even know where to begin.
Mostly I'm excited because this is a HUGE leap forward for not just
the mobile web... the extension of network neutrality principles to
the mobile web.
But also because it illustrates apple REALLY, REALLY get's mobile com
And java.
Sent via CrackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Freitas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:42:15
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED], videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: [video_vertigo] iPhone
sull wrote:
>
> do y
sull wrote:
>
> do you think osx is open to users or confined to approved applications?
>
I feel like they will push widgets as the primary application model for
developers. Just my guy instinct based on issues around deployment, updating,
and a networked application model.
+n
32 matches
Mail list logo
