[videoblogging] Re: Canon HV-20 24p-60i issue

2008-06-09 Thread Eric Rochow
hey thanks for all the info. i think i will end up getting the HV 30, as i want the Progressive format to have it look good on the web, and i'd like to avoid having to do the reverse telecine. eric.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Canon HV-20 24p-60i issue

2008-06-09 Thread Brook Hinton
You know, I thought I was responding to a different mailing list on which the tone of that would have been more appropriate and taken with a grain of salt, so please excuse the haughty tone and some irrelevant material within. Sorry!!! (slinking off to a corner) On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Bro

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Canon HV-20 24p-60i issue

2008-06-09 Thread Brook Hinton
It is 24p. Real 24p. It is just 24p with 3:2 pulldown added. It is no different in that sense from film footage you've had telecine'd or 24p (as opposed to PA) DVX100 footage. And unlike the XH-A1 and its ilk, it is true 24P rather than the pixel shift res-compromised fakery (effective as it is) of

[videoblogging] Re: Canon HV-20 24p-60i issue

2008-06-09 Thread Bill Cammack
Kary has the basics down. I use a Canon HV20 and shoot in "24P". It's not actually 24 progressive frames per second. It records 24 progressive frames across 60 interlaced frames. What this means is you have to do a double process. The first one is to import the video as HDV into Final Cut. On