[videoblogging] Re: Lets test the power of Digg

2006-05-28 Thread Susan
Hey Guys-- Something else that's going on here is that if you notice next to each person's comment, there are negative diggs. People can now give a thumbs-up or thumbs-down to people's comments on an article, and I'm sure this isn't helping the article any.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Lets test the power of Digg

2006-05-27 Thread ryanne hodson
someone canceled out my digg becuase i dugg my own projectguess i didnt know the digg rules.they also called me spam...damn!so we're minus a few on there.On 5/26/06, LeanBackVids.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also

[videoblogging] Re: Lets test the power of Digg

2006-05-26 Thread Bill Streeter
I'm sure the algorithm is secret. But I think it has something to do with, number of digs + the interval at which the diggs came in and I'm sure that there are some other less obvious factors as well. So if a story gets 30 digs in an hour it will probably have a better chance to make it to

[videoblogging] Re: Lets test the power of Digg

2006-05-26 Thread LeanBackVids.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also there have been rumors circulating that there are certain superusers on digg who's diggs have more weight than everyone else. This is true... If a user has a high homepage ratio, then they are given more