I don't know... I think I'm one of the few here that have mixed
emotions on this. I *am* against the government demanding the
footage... but at the same time he may have footage of people throwing
a burning mattress under a cop car and other acts of vandalism.
I applaud his determination though,
Hmm. I missed that piece of news before. Otherwise, I would have agreed with
Jarod. I've never felt sure about the gray areas in this one.
On 2/7/07, Steve Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, Josh has always said he doesn't have
any footage of any of that (and this was
confirmed by a
http://joshwolf.net/freejosh/
Wolf has repeatedly stated under oath that his unpublished material
does not contain footage of any of the alleged crimes committed. In a
show of good faith, Wolf has offered to let the judge review his tape.
The Honorable Judge William Alsop refused.
--- In
Okay... let's count the things I have to worry about as a blogger:
- saying something that will piss off some religious nut (pick your flavor -
I despise them all) and cause someone to call for my death
- saying something or allowing something to be said on my blog which could
lead to lawsuits
Well guess my mind has been changed... didn't hear that the Judge
refused to view it.
Guess I'm with the majority after all ;)
Jarod.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://joshwolf.net/freejosh/
Wolf has repeatedly stated under oath that his
On 2/7/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://joshwolf.net/freejosh/
Wolf has repeatedly stated under oath that his unpublished material
does not contain footage of any of the alleged crimes committed. In a
show of good faith, Wolf has offered to let the judge review his tape.
Yeah, the Chron article is good.
The important thing besides increasing pressure to release
Josh is to pass a federal shield law.
There is a link here for people in California to send email calling
for a federal shield law which covers all journalists (there is another
version which would not
