: [videoblogging] Re: What editing software?
I tried Ulead for a few weeks.
Try Vegas.
On 11/29/05, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried both Adobe Premire Elements and Ulead Studio 9, I liked
the
look of APE and I had previous experience with traditional
editing so
I
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 1:44 AM
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: What editing software?
I tried Ulead for a few weeks.
Try Vegas.
On 11/29/05, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried both Adobe Premire
As free downlod help software works wonders for file downloading. Now most files I download with broadband take a fraction of a second, but larger files take just a couple minutes with a helper. http://stardownloader.com/ Choose the free version.Now if video player technology would just
I'm a recent convert to Premiere Elements. While it takes a tiny
bit of getting used to, its really quite powerful.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I tried both Adobe Premire Elements and Ulead Studio 9, I liked the
look of APE and I had previous
Oh my god...please dont lead someone towards Pinnacle. I cant think of
a worse NLE to have someone attempt to use.
My opinion would be, if you are a beginner, to use Windows Movie Maker
if you dont want to spend any money. Adobe Premiere Elements if you
want to stay under $100.
More
I'm already using Windows Movie Maker and want to do a lot more with my
videos. Just hoping for some input on other editing software. I'm
assuming from your reaction Pinnacle is a no no? :)
Joan
http://rantingsofjoan.blogspot.com
On 11/29/05, blackhelicoptersvideo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh
If you're stuck in windows (aka no FCP) and avid is out of your range, go with Vegas Video.
It's really quite good, and when using FCP I often find myself annoyed
at the features I expect from Vegas which it doesn't support.
Also, for editing something with a shorter length, it's actually
Personally I like Avid. A lot of people on DV-L swear by Vegas,
and it's certainly a lot cheaper. I don't have experience with
Vegas myself, but a lot of people who do a lot more professional video
production than I do speak very highly of it. And I think there's
even some cheap-o under $100
Avoid adobe at all costs.
Use Sony Vegas. It is downloadable if you look around.
At 08:40 PM 11/28/2005, you wrote:
Oh my god...please dont lead someone towards Pinnacle. I cant think of
a worse NLE to have someone attempt to use.
My opinion would be, if you are a beginner, to use Windows
what's DV-L ? Also, the main fault in Vegas it you can't really
tag source footage and have multiple options / sub-sequences.
That's why for smaller/straight video, it comes in handy. And
strikes me as more precise than the 'big boys'.On 11/28/05, Michael Ridley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DV-L is here http://groups.google.com/group/DV-L - it's a Google Group
(although I subscribe to the mailing list) for DV (digital
video/camcorder) stuff. But a lot of the people on the mailing
list are professionals, so it's a pretty good source of info. Of
course most of these people are
I tried both Adobe Premire Elements and Ulead Studio 9, I liked the
look of APE and I had previous experience with traditional editing so
I got the hang of it right away.
If I had never done video editing before and was stepping up from WMM2
I would suggest Ulead. It has a lot of features for the
I tried Ulead for a few weeks.
Try Vegas.On 11/29/05, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried both Adobe Premire Elements and Ulead Studio 9, I liked the
look of APE and I had previous experience with traditional editing so
I got the hang of it right away.
If I had never done video editing
13 matches
Mail list logo
