[videoblogging] Re: question about wide angle lenses

2007-06-07 Thread bordercollieaustralianshepherd
Clever, unusual, edgy, avant garde, NOT up to spec FOR BROADCAST, inexpensive but cool, wide angle lens idea. H. G. Dietz http://aggregate.org/hankd/ Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Center for Visualization Virtual Environments University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0046

Re: [videoblogging] Re: question about wide angle lenses

2007-06-02 Thread Brook Hinton
Quality varies wildly with these, esp. when you get into the smaller (wider) multipliers. I would stick with the more reputable brands (Century Optics, Canon) unless you have the chance to try before you buy (or a source with a great return policy). Since they aren't actual lenses but rather lens

[videoblogging] Re: question about wide angle lenses

2007-06-01 Thread Bill Streeter
The lens I use is a .45 and it's pretty good because I don't get a lot of vignetting around the edges which can be a problem with some of the cheaper lenses. Of course it probably helps that I got a lens that was too big for the camera and use a step ring to attach it. My camera has a 43mm

[videoblogging] Re: question about wide angle lenses

2007-05-31 Thread Bill Streeter
Actually it's the other way around. The larger the number the less wide it is. So a .9 is less wide than a .45 and a .35 is wider still. A 1.0 is not wide at all. Think of it as reverse telephoto numbers. Telephotos are messured in number of times of magnification 1x 2x 10x etc. So wide angle

[videoblogging] Re: question about wide angle lenses

2007-05-31 Thread Heath
I see...what number do you use Bill? I got a .5X but I think I would like it a bit wider than that, but I am having trouble finding ones less than .5X at least here and on ebay at the moment, but maybe I am searching wrong.. Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com,

[videoblogging] Re: question about wide angle lenses

2007-05-31 Thread Heath
Also some wide angles say with macro and some don't what's the differance? Thanks Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's mainly for conventions when I need to be up close because of space issues but I would want to still be

[videoblogging] Re: question about wide angle lenses

2007-05-31 Thread Heath
It's mainly for conventions when I need to be up close because of space issues but I would want to still be able to get 2 or more people in easilymake sense? And actually for some things I think I would like the fish eye effecth Heath http://batmangeek.com --- In

[videoblogging] Re: question about wide angle lenses

2007-05-31 Thread David Howell
Some lenses blur our when you zoom in a lot. I have a .7 that does that and a .5 that doesnt. I would assume that with macro means full zoom through. David http://www.davidhowellstudios.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also some wide angles say with

[videoblogging] Re: question about wide angle lenses

2007-05-31 Thread Adrian Miles
around the 1/6/07 Heath mentioned about [videoblogging] Re: question about wide angle lenses that: Also some wide angles say with macro and some don't what's the differance? macro lets you do extreme close up, like filming bugs, flowers water droplets etc. this is when lens very close