Re: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-14 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Eric Rice wrote: > So, in short, publishing to M4V was a shortcut that sorta worked, minus the > brain fart I > had with editing the wrong server's MIME type. It was fast, had good quality > and I might > revisit it sooner, but in all actuality, I'll prolly do as much as I can to > mimic thos

Re: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Yes... this is the method I;ve previously suggested to folks. However, not everyone is technically capable of doing this. Even Eric Rice, who is a technically savvy dude has had trouble here. -Josh On 12/13/05, Jake Ludington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Behalf Of Joshua Kinberg > > You're c

RE: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Jake Ludington
> On Behalf Of Joshua Kinberg > You're correct, but it does solve the mime-type issue on the server side. If you specify a mime-type associated with M4V, it will work correctly as is. You don't need to swap the extension, simply put this in your .htaccess file: AddType video/mp4 .m4v Although I'

Re: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Joshua Kinberg
> Thanks Captain Obvious! ;) My point is, changing the file extension doesn't > mean it will play back with *all* H.264 decoders, because it won't. You're correct, but it does solve the mime-type issue on the server side. -Josh On 12/13/05, Jake Ludington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's b

RE: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Jake Ludington
> That's because its h.264. You need an h.264 decoder to view it... hence QT > 7. Thanks Captain Obvious! ;) My point is, changing the file extension doesn't mean it will play back with *all* H.264 decoders, because it won't. Jake Ludington http://www.PodcastingStarterKit.com http://www.jakeludi

Re: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Joshua Kinberg
> This is not entirely accurate. The M4V saved out by Save for iPod defaults > to H.264 with AAC audio. The M4V files available for sale through iTMS are > VRML Media video, which makes M4V a wrapper format of some kind, which > allows Apple to add DRM. Renaming the file from M4V to MP4 works for >

RE: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Jake Ludington
> Dude, m4v is nothing other than mp4 encoding at default settings > preset by Apple. > m4v is a myth. It is not a format. It is simply a file extension > pulled out of the ether, but not a different file type. You could name > it mp4 or mov as that would more accurately define the file type and >

Re: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Dude, m4v is nothing other than mp4 encoding at default settings preset by Apple. m4v is a myth. It is not a format. It is simply a file extension pulled out of the ether, but not a different file type. You could name it mp4 or mov as that would more accurately define the file type and you wouldn't

[videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Eric Rice
Okay, so lots of good discussion about formats. Some backstory first. When Apple came out with Quicktime 7, I was annoyed because it seemed that with the 3ivx codec, they took away the ability to encode it with MPEG4 audio and replaced it AAC. Now many vloggers I know (I'll use Steve for examp