now that I fixed the digg problem. I noticed that most of my links for
each post look like this
http://www.quintanomedia.com/?p=443
how come it doesnt have the title of my post in the url?
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:25 AM, quintanomedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now that I fixed the digg problem. I noticed that most of my links for
each post look like this
http://www.quintanomedia.com/?p=443
how come it doesnt have the title of my post in the url?
ah, its a strange mystery why
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:25:54 -
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] my blog post links
now that I fixed the digg problem. I noticed that most of my links
You can change it in Settings Permalinks.
Personally, I like the post number format. It keeps the URL short,
which means I don't need to shorten it to a TinyURL in emails, on
this list, or on Twitter. I can't think of many occasions I've found
a human readable link useful.
Rupert
Jay, you're correct - google et al pick up on words - even words in a URL.
So for best findability, your URL to say, a blog post, should be very
descriptive.
David Lee King
davidleeking.com - blog
davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog
twitter | skype: davidleeking
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:25 PM,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can change it in Settings Permalinks.
Personally, I like the post number format. It keeps the URL short,
which means I don't need to shorten it to a TinyURL in emails, on
this list, or on Twitter. I can't think of many
Obviously I can't say for sure, but it doesn't seem to make any
difference. Google's pretty smart at reading post titles, and the URL
doesn't seem to give any extra weight. My posts come at the top for
popular phrases even with a short URL. Not sure they could rank any
higher, really.
