Re: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-14 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Eric Rice wrote: So, in short, publishing to M4V was a shortcut that sorta worked, minus the brain fart I had with editing the wrong server's MIME type. It was fast, had good quality and I might revisit it sooner, but in all actuality, I'll prolly do as much as I can to mimic those

Re: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Dude, m4v is nothing other than mp4 encoding at default settings preset by Apple. m4v is a myth. It is not a format. It is simply a file extension pulled out of the ether, but not a different file type. You could name it mp4 or mov as that would more accurately define the file type and you

RE: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Jake Ludington
Dude, m4v is nothing other than mp4 encoding at default settings preset by Apple. m4v is a myth. It is not a format. It is simply a file extension pulled out of the ether, but not a different file type. You could name it mp4 or mov as that would more accurately define the file type and you

Re: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Joshua Kinberg
This is not entirely accurate. The M4V saved out by Save for iPod defaults to H.264 with AAC audio. The M4V files available for sale through iTMS are VRML Media video, which makes M4V a wrapper format of some kind, which allows Apple to add DRM. Renaming the file from M4V to MP4 works for

RE: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Jake Ludington
That's because its h.264. You need an h.264 decoder to view it... hence QT 7. Thanks Captain Obvious! ;) My point is, changing the file extension doesn't mean it will play back with *all* H.264 decoders, because it won't. Jake Ludington http://www.PodcastingStarterKit.com

Re: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Thanks Captain Obvious! ;) My point is, changing the file extension doesn't mean it will play back with *all* H.264 decoders, because it won't. You're correct, but it does solve the mime-type issue on the server side. -Josh On 12/13/05, Jake Ludington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's

RE: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Jake Ludington
On Behalf Of Joshua Kinberg You're correct, but it does solve the mime-type issue on the server side. If you specify a mime-type associated with M4V, it will work correctly as is. You don't need to swap the extension, simply put this in your .htaccess file: AddType video/mp4 .m4v Although

Re: [videoblogging] Why I chose M4V temporarily

2005-12-13 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Yes... this is the method I;ve previously suggested to folks. However, not everyone is technically capable of doing this. Even Eric Rice, who is a technically savvy dude has had trouble here. -Josh On 12/13/05, Jake Ludington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Behalf Of Joshua Kinberg You're