Hahaha ... My antidote to all the angst of the week.
On Feb 24, 2012, at 5:46 PM, ghand...@library.berkeley.edu wrote:
Have you been ingesting magic mushrooms again, Randy?
Gary
I deserve good things. I am entitled to my share of happiness. I wonder
Did anyone ever
Good call on the mental margarita. It is past noon and I'm ready for a
derivative, transformative mojito.
Sent from my iPhone
757.279.8871
On Feb 23, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Dennis Doros
milefi...@gmail.commailto:milefi...@gmail.com wrote:
I was going to stay out of this -- I think VideoLib has
With apologies for delay, and gratitude for the suggestions, I'm including
here resources that address concerns that have surfaced on this listserv,
and that help people understand what the Code does and doesn't do.
For those who want to know how the code was formed, and how it differs from
WHAT THIS ISN'T
This code of best practices was not negotiated with rights holders. This
code is the work of the academic and research library community and arises
from that community's values and mission. It presents a clear and
conscientious articulation of the values of that community, not
Actually Jonathan what this isn't is based on actual law and there
seems a great attempt to dress it up as it is. I am too tired to go
into detail
but the copyright cases closest on point to the issues discussed here
(Kinko's Michigan documents) ruled very specifically that just
because the
