Re: [Videolib] Studios with embargos

2012-01-12 Thread Ball, James (jmb4aw)
4-3812 From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] on behalf of bmal...@aol.com [bmal...@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 1:38 PM To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Videolib] Studios with embargos And then there's this news t

Re: [Videolib] Studios with embargos

2012-01-10 Thread bmalcze
have a more firm hold. ben malczewski Adult Reference Librarian Ypsilanti District Library Ann Arbor, MI 48105 bmal...@aol.com -Original Message- From: Brown, Roger To: videolib Sent: Tue, Jan 10, 2012 12:53 pm Subject: Re: [Videolib] Studios with embargos Fox and Universal also

Re: [Videolib] Studios with embargos

2012-01-10 Thread Brown, Roger
27;videolib@lists.berkeley.edu'" mailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu>> Subject: Re: [Videolib] Studios with embargos The only one that is currently using this practice is Warner Bros. Fox attempted it a few years back and then abandoned it. Myles From: videolib-boun...@lists.ber

Re: [Videolib] Studios with embargos

2012-01-10 Thread Jaeschke, Myles
: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu Subject: [Videolib] Studios with embargos Hi All, I'm sure I have this somewhere but I can't seem to dig it up. Does someone have a list of the studios that have a 30-day embargo (or longer) on video sales to rental operations and libraries? I want t

[Videolib] Studios with embargos

2012-01-09 Thread Ball, James (jmb4aw)
Hi All, I'm sure I have this somewhere but I can't seem to dig it up. Does someone have a list of the studios that have a 30-day embargo (or longer) on video sales to rental operations and libraries? I want to say it's Warner and Sony. Cheers, Matt __ Matt Ball M