Re: [Videolib] videolib Digest, Vol 32, Issue 64

2010-07-27 Thread ghandman
What? Me disingenuous? I agree with pretty much everything you're saying here, Larry. Gary I think Gary is being a little disingenuous to say that today's ruling has absolutely nothing to do with fair use. One need merely read UCLA's legal brief to see that they are making a fair use

Re: [Videolib] videolib Digest, Vol 32, Issue 64

2010-07-27 Thread Brewer, Michael
...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Lawrence Daressa Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 7:16 PM To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Videolib] videolib Digest, Vol 32, Issue 64 I think Gary is being a little disingenuous to say that today's ruling has absolutely nothing to do with fair use. One need merely

Re: [Videolib] videolib Digest, Vol 32, Issue 64

2010-07-27 Thread Jessica Rosner
@lists.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Videolib] videolib Digest, Vol 32, Issue 64 I think Gary is being a little disingenuous to say that today's ruling has absolutely nothing to do with fair use. One need merely read UCLA's legal brief to see that they are making a fair use claim for breaking encryption

Re: [Videolib] videolib Digest, Vol 32, Issue 64

2010-07-27 Thread Brewer, Michael
-boun...@lists.berkeley.edumailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Lawrence Daressa Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 7:16 PM To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edumailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Videolib] videolib Digest, Vol 32, Issue 64 I think Gary is being a little

Re: [Videolib] videolib Digest, Vol 32, Issue 64

2010-07-26 Thread Lawrence Daressa
I think Gary is being a little disingenuous to say that today's ruling has absolutely nothing to do with fair use. One need merely read UCLA's legal brief to see that they are making a fair use claim for breaking encryption not to use clips to critique or comment but to stream entire works.