Hey hey,
While integrating it completely is trivial. I have no real name for it
right now though. Let's assume it is named fminpp, then :
typedef fminpp::optimization_options optimization_options;
typedef fminpp::directions::cg cg;
//other aliases...
template
viennacl::vector minimize(Fun const
Hey hey,
I can't think of any such case where one would want to have control over
this. This would require knowledge of our implementations to make
appropriate choices anyway. In order to have a reasonable decision process,
we need to come up with some heuristics...
My first idea would be to compu
Karl Rupp writes:
> Cool! For packaging, we should either integrate it completely (i.e. make
> it part of the ViennaCL namespace), or keep it entirely separate,
> similar to how e.g. amgcl handles things. Packaging the two together
> would be a nightmare for packagers (Toby, please correct me i
