[VIHUELA] Re: Sanz and the High G

2008-04-25 Thread howard posner
On Apr 25, 2008, at 7:16 AM, Martyn Hodgson wrote: > cannot we assume that, like with lutes, the first course of guitars > were pitched as high (or at least not too far off) as they co= > uld reasonably bear. You can only assume this if you also assume the lack of a high octave on the th

[VIHUELA] Re: Sanz and the High G

2008-04-25 Thread Monica Hall
Rob, I wasn't attacking Monica!. I was disagreeing with her. It's called debate. No offence taken I can assure you! Long may debate continue! Monica To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

[VIHUELA] Re: Sanz and the High G

2008-04-25 Thread Rob MacKillop
2008/4/25 Eugene C. Braig IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > I am fond of this position. > So am I... BTW, I've just uploaded Espanoletas: www.songoftherose.co.uk and included an Updates page for quick reference. I'd also like to publicly thank Alexander Batov for making such a great guitar! Rob -- To

[VIHUELA] Re: Sanz and the High G

2008-04-25 Thread Eugene C. Braig IV
At 07:33 AM 4/25/2008, Monica Hall wrote: >The reason why I get into scraps with people is because they think that >they can prove categorically that the way they want to play the music >themselves must be the way which the composer himself intended it to be >played - and that everyone who plays

[VIHUELA] Re: Sanz and the High G

2008-04-25 Thread Monica Hall
Well I disagree with Monica. As she says quite openly, she is philosophising, and so it's not a question of her knowledge of just about everything there is to know about the Baroque guitar and its music. Just so - I wouldn't claim to know everything there is to know about the baroque guitar an

[VIHUELA] Re: Sanz and the High G

2008-04-25 Thread Rob MacKillop
Sorry, two corrections: 1. The guitar is from mid-18th not 17th century - at least according to the catalogue 2. I do know how to spell anonymous! Rob 2008/4/25 Rob MacKillop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Martyn, > > A 'deliterious effect in the bass', maybe, but there is no bass below the > g, at

[VIHUELA] Re: Sanz and the High G

2008-04-25 Thread Rob MacKillop
Hi Martyn, A 'deliterious effect in the bass', maybe, but there is no bass below the g, at least in Sanz's specified tuning. So, no, Martyn, I did not use modern bass strings. Another important factor is that Sanz does not mention pitch - we have no idea what pitch he used. Some argue that Roman p

[VIHUELA] PS to Re: Sanz and the High G

2008-04-25 Thread Martyn Hodgson
PS I've just opened my recent mailing in my inbox and noticed the =3D signs= which have crept into the text. The Sent message is OK though - does = anyone have any ideas what this is? Martyn --- On Fri, 25/4/08, Martyn Hodgson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .uk> wrote: From: M

[VIHUELA] Re: Sanz and the High G

2008-04-25 Thread Martyn Hodgson
Dear Rob, How exactly is your guitar strung?. Presumably you are obliged to lower = the general pitch of the instrument (say a minor third or so) to avoi= d frequent string breakages of a high third course. A gene= ral lowering of pitch will have a deliterious effect in the 'ba