Re: [Viking-devel] Viking 1.0.2 and 1.1 Projections

2011-05-17 Thread Greg Troxel
FWIW: I tried converting the gpx files from WGS84 to NAD27 and using the geotiffs with those tracks under viking. That still didn't work, even though the gpx transforms looked correct. That may be because NAD27 uses a different ellipsoid, so converting coordinates that are in NAD27 but

Re: [Viking-devel] Viking 1.0.2 and 1.1 Projections

2011-05-16 Thread Harry G McGavran Jr
FWIW: I tried converting the gpx files from WGS84 to NAD27 and using the geotiffs with those tracks under viking. That still didn't work, even though the gpx transforms looked correct. I have the gpsbabel scripts I used for that if any one is interested. Basically one has to use gpsbabel to

Re: [Viking-devel] Viking 1.0.2 and 1.1 Projections

2011-05-14 Thread Greg Troxel
I haven't tried geotiff, but I do have DRG images for my region (in NAD27). If you could send a note how you configure that, I'll try it. I wonder if viking should depend on proj. pgpTNWHc5IXqh.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Viking-devel] Viking 1.0.2 and 1.1 Projections

2011-05-14 Thread Greg Troxel
Guilhem Bonnefille guilhem.bonnefi...@gmail.com writes: 2011/5/14 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com: I haven't tried geotiff, but I do have DRG images for my region (in NAD27).   If you could send a note how you configure that, I'll try it. I don't know what NAD27 is. AFAIK, currently, viking

[Viking-devel] Viking 1.0.2 and 1.1 Projections

2011-05-13 Thread Harry G McGavran Jr
It has been since 2009 that I last used viking. At that time I contributed some magic-scissors patches that were incorporated into viking. For various reasons I tried the latest two versions and had a problem I didn't have with whatever version was current in 2009. I use geotiffs in combination