Gene Kwiecinski wrote:
> Which is kind of the point. If a provider doesn't impose at least
> minimally-intrusive measures to prevent spamming (eg, maximum of N
> emails sent per hour, progressively slowing to a crawl with increasing
> volume, etc.), ie, things which wouldn't affect you or me no
>>Piqued my curiosity, asked around, got back this as a possible
>>explanation:
>>
>> See http://www.us.sorbs.net/faq/spamdb.shtml
>>
>>I have *no* idea who Joey McNichols be, or why he needs a legal
defense,
>>etc., but it seems as though the whole SORBS thing might be on the
>>up-and-up, if
