Yup, I can confirm it too. I'm in Windows with cygwin and command
:echo has("tcl") crashes gvim. :)
On 10/5/06, Steve Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "Greg Dunn", Thu, October 05, 2006 9:36 am
> On 10/4/06, Steve Hall wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 10:04 +1000, Robbie Gates wrote:
> > >
Is always guaranteed to be the same as and is
always guaranteed to be unique?
nikolai
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
Is always guaranteed to be the same as and is
always guaranteed to be unique?
nikolai
1. No. From ":help ":
when executing autocommands, is replaced with the file name
for a file read or write
when executing autocommands,
On 11/8/06, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> Is always guaranteed to be the same as and is
> always guaranteed to be unique?
>
> nikolai
>
1. No. From ":help ":
when executing autocommands, is replaced with the file name
for a
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[...]
Ah, sorry. My question was incomplete. Is guaranteed to be
equal to for all commands where a file isn't being
read/sourced? Specifically, do they refer to the same buffer for
BufDelete? The BufDelete documentation suggests using , but
I'd much prefer using the b
On 11/8/06, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> Ah, sorry. My question was incomplete. Is guaranteed to be
> equal to for all commands where a file isn't being
> read/sourced? Specifically, do they refer to the same buffer for
> BufDelete? The BufDelete doc
On 11/8/06, Nikolai Weibull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and is always guaranteed to be unique?
No. Namely, unnamed buffers are problem here. Some autocommands
that use can be invoked on unnamed buffers (I had such case).
In this case, you have to use .
As long as buffer is not unnamed and is
(for those of you who don't follow vim@vim.org, this is an answer to a
message posted there because I got confused and posted in both lists ...)
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
koxinga wrote:
koxinga wrote:
Hello,
[...]
It won't work with multibyte.
[...]
Any feedback appreciated, of course ...
Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
> In vimtutor, I see:
>
> NOTE: A count between the operator d and the motion works similar to
>using the motion without an operator.
>
> However, it seems that "2dw" works the same as "d2w". I think the tutor
> needs to be updated.
>
> I'm using
All,
I decided to make a mapping that simply hits "" whenever the popup
menu comes up. This is to make the popup behavior work more like in
IDEs, where the user can just select the nearest completion item at any
moment by hitting enter ("" does this in Vim).
Here are two mappings I tried to accom
10 matches
Mail list logo
