Alexei Alexandrov wrote:
> Hi Bram Moolenaar, you wrote:
>
> >
> > It sounds like keeping only 1024 bytes would already work for most
> > situations. That would be an acceptable amount to keep allocated at
> > all times. So why don't we use this as the initial size, and when it
> > grows larg
Upgraded from novell-SUSE Linux 9.3 to openSUSE 10.2
My Vim compiled under 9.3 refuses to load: "perl.so not found".
Recompiled (with make reconfig, same feature set).
The new executable runs (with -ruby but I'll try to see about that).
The display (with the same 'guifont') is *much* more good-loo
Hi Bram Moolenaar, you wrote:
>
> It sounds like keeping only 1024 bytes would already work for most
> situations. That would be an acceptable amount to keep allocated at
> all times. So why don't we use this as the initial size, and when it
> grows larger we free it when finished. The growth
Alexei Alexandrov wrote:
> > This sounds like a bug in getc(). It should know that only one thread
> > is reading the file and skip the locking. I don't think we should fix
> > library bugs in Vim, unless it's crashing or another significant problem.
> >
> It can't be a bug. I might be missing
Hi Bram Moolenaar, you wrote:
>> It's Windows, but on Linux it should be similar.
>
> I would not assume it's similar until there is proof.
>
Of course. I'm going to investigate it there.
>
> This sounds like a bug in getc(). It should know that only one thread
> is reading the file and skip
