scott wrote:
a visit to yast, software management, searched for ncftp and it
brought ncftp right to the fore, installed it for me, and i've been
happily learning features since -- imagine commandline recall that
works in ftp! bookmarks!
And I just figured out that it comes with an utility cal
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Well, AFAICT it has disappeared between SuSE 10.0 and 10.2.
No, my copy of Suse 10.2 contains the package:
[18]/media/dvdram/suse/i586: rpm -qip ncftp-3.2.0-17.i586.rpm
Name: ncftp Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 3.2.0
There is no such thing as a single-threaded Windows app. The programmer
might only start one thread, but other system components might start other
threads in the process, so the CRT needs to be aware of threads whether or
not the programmer does any threading. That's why Microsoft stopped creating
scott wrote:
[...]
ncftp should have popped right up for you -- what do you have
in "Configured Software Catalogs" (under installation sources)?
sc
Status Refresh Name URL
On On YaST
iso:///?iso=openSUSE-10.2-GM-DVD-i386.iso&url=hd:///?device=/dev/hda2&filesystem=auto
On On
:set enc? penc?
encoding=utf-8
printencoding=utf-8
:%ha
not found in runtimepath: print/utf-8.ps
Is this last message normal?
I have here a file including an Esperanto-French glossary, which contains both
the consonants+circumflex of Esperanto and the French oe ligature. No matter
how I tr
On Thursday 17 May 2007 13:32, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> > A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> >> - What is ncftp? On my openSUSE 10.2 system I have a program
> >> called "ftp" but none called "ncftp".
> Well, AFAICT it has disappeared between SuSE 10.0 and 10.2. I have
> packages named lftp and lukemftp (which
On 18/05/07, Doug Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's nothing wrong with msvcr71.dll or msvcr80.dll. In fact, they
have many bug fixes and performance improvements over msvcrt.dll.
Thinking more carefully on this, I tend to disagree. Only the
interfaces in msvcrt.dll is more or less fixed,
Hi Doug,
On 18/05/07, Doug Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the lib is added explicitly, you're right -- it probably won't
break anything.
However, there are actually three CRTs. libc (single-threaded
static), libcmt (multi-threaded static), and msvcrt (multi-threaded
DLL). libc is no longer
If the lib is added explicitly, you're right -- it probably won't break
anything.
However, there are actually three CRTs. libc (single-threaded static),
libcmt (multi-threaded static), and msvcrt (multi-threaded DLL). libc is no
longer supported (there is no longer any such thing as a single-threa
Stephan Hegel wrote:
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
- What is ncftp? On my openSUSE 10.2 system I have a program called
"ftp" but none called "ncftp".
[39]./home/steve: rpm -qi ncftp
Name: ncftpRelocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 3.1.9
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
- What is ncftp? On my openSUSE 10.2 system I have a program called
"ftp" but none called "ncftp".
[39]./home/steve: rpm -qi ncftp
Name: ncftpRelocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 3.1.9 Vendor: SUSE LINUX Pr
Hi Doug,
On 17/05/07, Doug Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bram is wise.
No objection here ;-).
Adding a nodefaultlib:msvcrt could potentially break things if you set
USE_MSVCRT=1 to use the CRT DLL instead of statically linking the CRT. The
problem is that you're linking a static-CRT versio
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
- What is ncftp? On my openSUSE 10.2 system I have a program called
"ftp" but none called "ncftp".
ncftp (pronounced Nik-F-T-P) is an alternative command-line FTP client.
Slackware ships it[1] (or so the link leads me to believe). You can
read more at the ncftp[2] web
On 2007-02-15, Frodak Baksik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/15/07, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> > > > Also, is there anything I can do to help get the original
> > > > patch accepted?
> > >
> > > Ask a few people to try it out and report their results here.
> >
> > I'll give it a shot. Is there s
Stephan Hegel wrote:
Hi,
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
- Using "cat" is OK as long as you can be sure that you'll get them in
numeric order: this is usually the case on Unix but not necessarily on
Dos, where a wildcarded filename usually gets its results in directory
order, not sorted by filename.
W
Hi,
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
- Using "cat" is OK as long as you can be sure that you'll get them in
numeric order: this is usually the case on Unix but not necessarily on
Dos, where a wildcarded filename usually gets its results in directory
order, not sorted by filename.
Well, you are right: I'
16 matches
Mail list logo