Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-18 Thread Stephan Hegel
Hi, Ali Akcaagac wrote: A lot of the readers here als prefer lftp as good choice for ftp'ing. Well, since I do use ncftp anyway on several platforms I've got ncftpget for free and so the posted approach is perfectly fine for me. I don't speak for others, of course, just trying to show and share

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-18 Thread Ali Akcaagac
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 07:21 +0200, Stephan Hegel wrote: > ncftpget ftp.vim.org . '/pub/editors/vim/patches/7.1/7.1.*' > fetches all patches to the local directory in one go. > > And it does it in a smart way, see the second try: > ncftpget ftp.vim.org . '/pub/editors/vim/patches/7.1/7.1.*'

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread Stephan Hegel
scott wrote: a visit to yast, software management, searched for ncftp and it brought ncftp right to the fore, installed it for me, and i've been happily learning features since -- imagine commandline recall that works in ftp! bookmarks! And I just figured out that it comes with an utility cal

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread Stephan Hegel
A.J.Mechelynck wrote: Well, AFAICT it has disappeared between SuSE 10.0 and 10.2. No, my copy of Suse 10.2 contains the package: [18]/media/dvdram/suse/i586: rpm -qip ncftp-3.2.0-17.i586.rpm Name: ncftp Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 3.2.0

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
scott wrote: [...] ncftp should have popped right up for you -- what do you have in "Configured Software Catalogs" (under installation sources)? sc Status Refresh Name URL On On YaST iso:///?iso=openSUSE-10.2-GM-DVD-i386.iso&url=hd:///?device=/dev/hda2&filesystem=auto On On

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread scott
On Thursday 17 May 2007 13:32, A.J.Mechelynck wrote: > > A.J.Mechelynck wrote: > >> - What is ncftp? On my openSUSE 10.2 system I have a program > >> called "ftp" but none called "ncftp". > Well, AFAICT it has disappeared between SuSE 10.0 and 10.2. I have > packages named lftp and lukemftp (which

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Stephan Hegel wrote: A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - What is ncftp? On my openSUSE 10.2 system I have a program called "ftp" but none called "ncftp". [39]./home/steve: rpm -qi ncftp Name: ncftpRelocations: (not relocatable) Version : 3.1.9

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread Stephan Hegel
A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - What is ncftp? On my openSUSE 10.2 system I have a program called "ftp" but none called "ncftp". [39]./home/steve: rpm -qi ncftp Name: ncftpRelocations: (not relocatable) Version : 3.1.9 Vendor: SUSE LINUX Pr

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread Michael Henry
A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - What is ncftp? On my openSUSE 10.2 system I have a program called "ftp" but none called "ncftp". ncftp (pronounced Nik-F-T-P) is an alternative command-line FTP client. Slackware ships it[1] (or so the link leads me to believe). You can read more at the ncftp[2] web

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Stephan Hegel wrote: Hi, A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - Using "cat" is OK as long as you can be sure that you'll get them in numeric order: this is usually the case on Unix but not necessarily on Dos, where a wildcarded filename usually gets its results in directory order, not sorted by filename. W

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread Stephan Hegel
Hi, A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - Using "cat" is OK as long as you can be sure that you'll get them in numeric order: this is usually the case on Unix but not necessarily on Dos, where a wildcarded filename usually gets its results in directory order, not sorted by filename. Well, you are right: I'

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-16 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Stephan Hegel wrote: A.J.Mechelynck wrote: patch -p0 As long as you have two patches this can be done easily. But what if you have 100+ ? Then try this: cat patches/7.1.* > patchfile patch -p0 < patchfile rm patchfile Done. Rgds, Stephan. If you have more than a hundred, Bram sets

[Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-16 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Forward to vim-dev list. See my comments at bottom. Original Message Subject: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 08:14:28 -0700 From: Tushar Desai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PR