On Oct 13 14:06, Gary Johnson wrote:
> I thought the purpose of Cygwin was to provide a Linux-like
> environment for applications, so that, for example, one could simply
> recompile under Cygwin an application written for Linux and not have
> to rewrite the file-handling routines to recognize DO
On Oct 13 18:10, James Vega wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:34:40PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Oct 13 16:06, James Vega wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:38:16PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > Interesting enough it works in 6.4 without doing anything similar to my
> > >
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:34:40PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 13 16:06, James Vega wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:38:16PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > Interesting enough it works in 6.4 without doing anything similar to my
> > > patch does to os_unix.c. What's different
On 2006-10-13, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 13 21:53, Yakov Lerner wrote:
> > On 10/13/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >I got a report on the Cygwin mailing list that the following message
> > >appears when trying to open /etc/hosts in vim:
On Oct 13 16:06, James Vega wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:38:16PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Interesting enough it works in 6.4 without doing anything similar to my
> > patch does to os_unix.c. What's different in swap file handling between
> > 6.4 and 7.0 so that it works in the for
On Oct 13 22:02, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Interesting enough it works in 6.4 without doing anything similar to my
> >patch does to os_unix.c. What's different in swap file handling between
> >6.4 and 7.0 so that it works in the former but doesn;t in the latter?
>
> Is yo
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:38:16PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Interesting enough it works in 6.4 without doing anything similar to my
> patch does to os_unix.c. What's different in swap file handling between
> 6.4 and 7.0 so that it works in the former but doesn;t in the latter?
memline.c w
Yakov Lerner wrote:
[...]
I mean, I tried 'ls c:\windows' in cygwin and it does not work ..
strange is it issue of version of cygwin ? I saw even
weirder differences in cygwin behaviour ... fat32 vs ntfs differences...
Maybe this is because \ have a special meaning for bash or some othe
On Oct 13 21:53, Yakov Lerner wrote:
> On 10/13/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I got a report on the Cygwin mailing list that the following message
> >appears when trying to open /etc/hosts in vim:
> >
> > E303: Unable to open swap file for "/etc/hosts", recovery imp
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 13 21:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 13 21:16, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[...]
Below is a patch which works for me, though I'm not sure if it's
complete enough to catch all cases. There's code for OS2 in os_unix.c
which I reused, plus a n
On 10/13/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I got a report on the Cygwin mailing list that the following message
appears when trying to open /etc/hosts in vim:
E303: Unable to open swap file for "/etc/hosts", recovery impossible
What happens is this:
/etc/hosts is by defaul
On Oct 13 21:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 13 21:16, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > Below is a patch which works for me, though I'm not sure if it's
> > > complete enough to catch all cases. There's code for OS2 in os_unix.c
> > > which I reused, plus a
On Oct 13 21:16, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > I got a report on the Cygwin mailing list that the following message
> > appears when trying to open /etc/hosts in vim:
> >
> > E303: Unable to open swap file for "/etc/hosts", recovery impossible
> >
> > What happens is th
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I got a report on the Cygwin mailing list that the following message
> appears when trying to open /etc/hosts in vim:
>
> E303: Unable to open swap file for "/etc/hosts", recovery impossible
>
> What happens is this:
>
> /etc/hosts is by default a symbolic link whic
Hi,
I got a report on the Cygwin mailing list that the following message
appears when trying to open /etc/hosts in vim:
E303: Unable to open swap file for "/etc/hosts", recovery impossible
What happens is this:
/etc/hosts is by default a symbolic link which points to the hosts file
in the Win
15 matches
Mail list logo
