Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 4/24/07, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>> > On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [snip]
>> > I mean, seriously, it's a lot more intuitive to write
>> >
>> > Vim.options['formatoptions'] =
>> Vim.options['formatoptions'
On 4/25/07, Robert Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> The only question that is really relevant here is: why it isn't enough
> with having an ECMAScript extension instead of having it replace
> VimScript?
>
> The following arguments have been giv
On 4/24/07, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Robert Lee wrote:
>> > [snip]
>>
>> > Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
>> > using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn
ions. Any
library
available for any of these languages can be made available to the Vim
runtime with minimal hassle.
Wasn't that sort of my argument?
Are there lots of VimScript libraries that are
outside the application domain? So how does replacing VimScript with
ECMAScript pre
y
available for any of these languages can be made available to the Vim
runtime with minimal hassle.
Wasn't that sort of my argument?
Are there lots of VimScript libraries that are
outside the application domain? So how does replacing VimScript with
ECMAScript prevent these interes
languages can be made available to the Vim
runtime with minimal hassle.
Wasn't that sort of my argument?
Are there lots of VimScript libraries that are
outside the application domain? So how does replacing VimScript with
ECMAScript prevent these interesting possibilities?
I don't se
Yakov Lerner wrote:
> [snip]
> So do not worry, replacement of vimscript by the favourite language
> of some vim's random user is not going to happen.
That is obvious. The point was the question why the OP named
language X and not Y for this.
>
> Yakov
--
For robots (please don't mail me there):
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Lee wrote:
> [snip]
> Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
> using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
If I understand you correctly, you assume that
ECMASc
On 4/24/07, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 4/24/07, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:49:49AM +0300, Ilya Sher wrote:
> >> Robert Lee wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >> > Counterwish #2:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 4/24/07, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:49:49AM +0300, Ilya Sher wrote:
> >> Robert Lee wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >> > Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
> >>
On 4/24/07, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 05:57:45PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Robert Lee wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >
> >> Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
> >> using Spid
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 05:57:45PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Robert Lee wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >
> >> Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
> >> using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new langua
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Robert Lee wrote:
>> > [snip]
>>
>> > Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
>> > using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
>> If I understand you correctly, you as
On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Lee wrote:
> [snip]
> Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
> using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
If I understand you correctly, you assume that
ECMAScript is the most popular
On 4/24/07, Yakov Lerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Lee wrote:
> > [snip]
>
> > Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
> > using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
As a sarcasti
On 4/24/07, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:49:49AM +0300, Ilya Sher wrote:
> Robert Lee wrote:
> [snip]
> > Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
> > using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
> If I
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:49:49AM +0300, Ilya Sher wrote:
> Robert Lee wrote:
> [snip]
> > Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
> > using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
> If I understand you correctly, you assume that
> ECMAScript is
On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Lee wrote:
> [snip]
> Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
> using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
As a sarcastic joke, this sounds average. But seriously, vim
having supprt
Robert Lee wrote:
> [snip]
> Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
> using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
If I understand you correctly, you assume that
ECMAScript is the most popular language among
the people that wish to customize V
19 matches
Mail list logo
