scrolloff enhancement wish

2006-07-20 Thread Yakov Lerner
Hello Bram, Would you include into todo.txt the thing that I used in one very ancient but exceptionally smooth editor called K52 (it worked on pdp11, vt52 terminals). This editor always positioned cursor at 2/3 height from top of screen. This worked surprisingly well, even if it sounds strange. I

Re: scrolloff enhancement wish

2006-07-21 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Yakov Lerner wrote: > Would you include into todo.txt the thing that I used > in one very ancient but exceptionally smooth editor called K52 > (it worked on pdp11, vt52 terminals). > > This editor always positioned cursor at 2/3 height from top of screen. > This worked surprisingly well, even if

Re: scrolloff enhancement wish

2006-07-21 Thread Matthew Winn
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 10:02:10AM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Yakov Lerner wrote: > > How about adding the option 'scrollfix' [to the todo.txt], which > > would fix the cursor on fixed line, in percantage 0-100. > > Value ':set scrollfix=50' would work like ':set scrolloff=999'. > > Value

Re: scrolloff enhancement wish

2006-07-21 Thread Nicolas Weber
Hi, Too many options? Is that possible? Obviously ;-) As you said, you can probably write a keymapping that does what you want (:map j might do what you want if I understood you correctly). Bye, Nico

Re: scrolloff enhancement wish

2006-07-21 Thread Hari Krishna Dara
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 at 9:23am, Matthew Winn wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 10:02:10AM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > > Yakov Lerner wrote: > > > How about adding the option 'scrollfix' [to the todo.txt], which > > > would fix the cursor on fixed line, in percantage 0-100. > > > Value ':se

Re: scrolloff enhancement wish

2006-07-22 Thread scott
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 09:23 +0100, Matthew Winn wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 10:02:10AM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Yakov Lerner wrote: > I suppose there might be some way to map all the movement commands to > reposition the current line to a certain place on the screen, but at the > time