Peter --
> thanks for the changes and yes git-send-mail is better but I have't
> set up the config for that. Will do next time.
Great. The nice thing about having the git formatted patches is that
someone can check them in directly so you get credit right in the
changelog as the author of
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Peter Vasil
wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> thanks for the changes and yes git-send-mail is better but I have't
> set up the config for that. Will do next time.
>
> I see that you changed all linux viewers to have the unique option. I
> don't know if they have the option. I
Hi Ted,
thanks for the changes and yes git-send-mail is better but I have't
set up the config for that. Will do next time.
I see that you changed all linux viewers to have the unique option. I
don't know if they have the option. I just know about okular.
And yes, if I forward search in okular wi
> Good work. A few comments though. Before that, have you used patchbomb?
Sorry -- forgot which project this was. "git send-email" is what I
meant, of course... :)
--Ted
--
Ted Pavlic
--
Try before you buy = See
Peter --
Good work. A few comments though. Before that, have you used patchbomb?
Sometimes it's nice to be able to scrutinize a patch within an e-mail
(as opposed to an attached file).
> I use pdf as output and latex-suite only supports dvi on linux. I
> changed the hardcoded ".dvi" into
Hi,
I use pdf as output and latex-suite only supports dvi on linux. I
changed the hardcoded ".dvi" into ".s:target:". and it works now with
pdf files. Also added --unique option.
What do you think?
I attached the patch.
Peter
From 360d6ccb7c026f8f3867c38c219f8d5cc38e647f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
