> Using a *built-in parser* is solution emphasized by Charles E.
> Campbell Jr in a related post. A parser would be perfect for syntax-
> checking, but I think the code checker should also detect errors like
> a misspelled library name.
At least for C, you could use the clang C frontend ( clang.l
On 12/04/08 22:29, Mikolaj Machowski wrote:
> Dnia Saturday 12 of April 2008, Tony Mechelynck napisał:
>> On 12/04/08 20:29, Mikolaj Machowski wrote:
>>> Dnia Saturday 12 of April 2008, Bram Moolenaar napisał:
Here is an update for the floating point patch. The 'g' argument for
printf()
Dnia Saturday 12 of April 2008, Tony Mechelynck napisał:
> On 12/04/08 20:29, Mikolaj Machowski wrote:
> > Dnia Saturday 12 of April 2008, Bram Moolenaar napisał:
> >> Here is an update for the floating point patch. The 'g' argument for
> >> printf() was implemented and a few bug fixes.
> >>
> >>
On 12/04/08 20:29, Mikolaj Machowski wrote:
> Dnia Saturday 12 of April 2008, Bram Moolenaar napisał:
>> Here is an update for the floating point patch. The 'g' argument for
>> printf() was implemented and a few bug fixes.
>>
>> This is to be applied to the original source code, without the older
On 12/04/08 19:57, Steve Hall wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 16:58 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>> I would still like feedback on the format of floating point numbers:
>>
>>&123.456
>>&1.23e-3
>
> I don't understand the ampersand, why not something more mnemonic:
>
> f123.456
> .
Dnia Saturday 12 of April 2008, Bram Moolenaar napisał:
> Here is an update for the floating point patch. The 'g' argument for
> printf() was implemented and a few bug fixes.
>
> This is to be applied to the original source code, without the older
> floating point patch.
>
One thing:
let a = &1.
Hey everybody,
Apparently many students (like me) are interested in this project. So,
I decided to start a new thread where we can talk about the challenges
in the project and how to solve them. I went over previous posts to
include all the related ideas in this new thread.
Here are a few initia
On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 16:58 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> I would still like feedback on the format of floating point numbers:
>
> &123.456
> &1.23e-3
I don't understand the ampersand, why not something more mnemonic:
f123.456
.123.456
f.123.456
.f123.456
+123.456
--
On 12/04/08 16:58, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Here is an update for the floating point patch. The 'g' argument for
> printf() was implemented and a few bug fixes.
>
> This is to be applied to the original source code, without the older
> floating point patch.
>
> I would still like feedback on the f
