On Saturday, June 15, 2013 10:54:37 PM UTC+3, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> The completion works by generating a dump of all valid words. This
Hmmm. Isn't there a way to generate a list of only words beginning with a
certain prefix? After all, "complete" generally means you have some text
written a
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Christian Wellenbrock <
christian.wellenbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, June 14, 2013 10:35:59 PM UTC+2, Manuel Ortega wrote:
> > Buried in that gist file is a line that shows the OP is using a beta
> version of XCode5, which won't come out until OS X 10.9 com
On Friday, June 14, 2013 4:02:26 PM UTC-5, Christian Wellenbrock wrote:
> On Friday, June 14, 2013 10:35:59 PM UTC+2, Manuel Ortega wrote:
>
> > Buried in that gist file is a line that shows the OP is using a beta
> > version of XCode5, which won't come out until OS X 10.9 comes out.
> > Possib
I was too quick to say the problems disappeared.
With 32-bit gvim 7.3.1182 and later, on 64-bit Win 7 SP1, a hang is often
obtained with the simplest of procedures:
gvim -u NONE a.txt
Make any edit
:w
It happens in many, but not all, of the subdirectories associated with my user
identity, ie
On 15-Jun-2013 Mats Bertil Tegner wrote:
> On 06/15/2013 03:10 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> >Patch 7.3.1196
> >Problem:Old regexp engine does not match pattern with backref correctly.
> > (Dominique Pelle)
> >Solution: Fix setting status. Test multi-line patterns better.
> >Files
Patch 7.3.1203
Problem:Matches from matchadd() might be highlighted incorrectly when they
are at a fixed position and inserting lines. (John Szakmeister)
Solution: Redraw all lines below a change if there are highlighted matches.
(idea by Christian Brabandt)
Files:
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 90 by brammool...@gmail.com: incorrect parsing of
exuberant ctags tags file
http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=90
Problem is that case-folding sorts a tag such as "!rm" before "!_TAG", but
the check for the end of the header does
Patch 7.3.1202 (after 7.3.660)
Problem:Tags are not found in case-folded tags file. (Darren cole, Issue
90)
Solution: Take into account that when case folding was used for the tags
file "!rm" sorts before the "!_TAG" header lines.
Files: src/tag.c
*** ../vim-7.
Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > > Bram,
> > > when vim starts up, and some plugin opens the preview window, the cursor
> > > will move to the preview window and not stay in the other window.
> > >
> > > This can be seen here:
> > >
> > > vim -u NONE -N --cmd 'pedit ~/.vimrc' foobar
> > >
> > >
Ron Aaron wrote:
> C'mon, Bram, is that the best you can suggest? "Don't use that spell file"?
>
> What is it that makes it unusably slow, and how can I work around it?
> Is the problem the affix stuff?
The completion works by generating a dump of all valid words. This
spell file has way too
Patch 7.3.1201
Problem:When a startup script creates a preview window, it probably
becomes the current window.
Solution: Make another window the current one. (Christian Brabandt)
Files: src/main.c
*** ../vim-7.3.1200/src/main.c 2013-06-12 20:35:46.0 +0200
--- src/
Hi Bram!
On Fr, 14 Jun 2013, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Christian Brabandt wrote:
>
> > Bram,
> > when vim starts up, and some plugin opens the preview window, the cursor
> > will move to the preview window and not stay in the other window.
> >
> > This can be seen here:
> >
> > vim -u NONE -
C'mon, Bram, is that the best you can suggest? "Don't use that spell file"?
What is it that makes it unusably slow, and how can I work around it? Is the
problem the affix stuff?
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you a
On 06/15/2013 03:10 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Patch 7.3.1196
Problem:Old regexp engine does not match pattern with backref correctly.
(Dominique Pelle)
Solution: Fix setting status. Test multi-line patterns better.
Files: src/regexp.c, src/testdir/test64.in, src/testdir/t
Patch 7.3.1200
Problem:When calling setline() from Insert mode, using CTRL-R =, undo does
not work properly. (Israel Chauca)
Solution: Sync undo after evaluating the expression. (Christian Brabandt)
Files: src/edit.c, src/testdir/test61.in, src/testdir/test61.ok
*** ../vim
Patch 7.3.1199
Problem:When evaluating 'foldexpr' causes an error this is silently
ignored and evaluation is retried every time.
Solution: Set emsg_silent instead of emsg_off. Stop evaluating 'foldexpr' is
it is causing errors. (Christian Brabandt)
Files: src/fo
Patch 7.3.1198
Problem:Build error when using Perl 5.18.0 and dynamic loading.
Solution: Change #ifdefs for Perl_croak_xs_usage. (Ike Devolder)
Files: src/if_perl.xs
*** ../vim-7.3.1197/src/if_perl.xs 2013-05-06 04:21:35.0 +0200
--- src/if_perl.xs 2013-06-15 16:42:45
Manuel Ortega wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Manuel Ortega
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Dominique Pellé
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> These 2 commands which only differ by using re=1 or re=2
>>> do not highlight the same text. It's correct with re=2 and
>>> incorr
Patch 7.3.1197
Problem:":wviminfo!" does not write history previously read from a viminfo
file. (Roland Eggner)
Solution: When not merging history write all entries.
Files: src/ex_cmds.c, src/ex_getln.c, src/proto/ex_getln.pro
*** ../vim-7.3.1196/src/ex_cmds.c 2013-
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Manuel Ortega wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Dominique Pellé <
> dominique.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> These 2 commands which only differ by using re=1 or re=2
>> do not highlight the same text. It's correct with re=2 and
>> incorrect with re
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Dominique Pellé
wrote:
> Hi
>
> These 2 commands which only differ by using re=1 or re=2
> do not highlight the same text. It's correct with re=2 and
> incorrect with re=1 (with re=1, the second line is not
> entirely highlighted, but it should be):
>
> $ vim -u
Dominique Pelle wrote:
> These 2 commands which only differ by using re=1 or re=2
> do not highlight the same text. It's correct with re=2 and
> incorrect with re=1 (with re=1, the second line is not
> entirely highlighted, but it should be):
>
> $ vim -u NONE --noplugin -N -c 'set hls re=1' \
Patch 7.3.1196
Problem:Old regexp engine does not match pattern with backref correctly.
(Dominique Pelle)
Solution: Fix setting status. Test multi-line patterns better.
Files: src/regexp.c, src/testdir/test64.in, src/testdir/test64.ok
*** ../vim-7.3.1195/src/regexp.c
23 matches
Mail list logo
