On Saturday, November 9, 2013 10:25:18 PM UTC+4, ZyX wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2013 6:46 PM, "Tom Jones" wrote:
> >
> > # fine
> > ---
> > - key1: foo
> > - key2: bar="abc"
> > - key3: qwerty
> >
> > # fine
> > ---
> > - key1: foo
> > - key2: bar "x "
> > - key3: qwerty
> >
> > #
On Nov 9, 2013 6:46 PM, "Tom Jones" wrote:
>
> # fine
> ---
> - key1: foo
> - key2: bar="abc"
> - key3: qwerty
>
> # fine
> ---
> - key1: foo
> - key2: bar "x "
> - key3: qwerty
>
> # broken, thinks quotes are mismatched
> ---
> - key1: foo
> - key2: bar q="x "
>
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 67 by drc...@campbellfamily.biz: scp resets several
options
http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=67
I believe that this problem was due to an out-of-date netrw and has been
fixed awhile back.
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 59 by drc...@campbellfamily.biz: netrw breaks
scripts.vim
http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=59
I believe this problem was fixed awhile back.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue noti
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #7 on issue 140 by drc...@campbellfamily.biz: netrw plugin
NetrwTreeListing
http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=140
Hello!
Please try v150i of netrw from my website:
http://.drchip.org/astronaut/vim/index.html#NETRW.
Regards,
C Campbel
Hi Leonard Ehrenfried,
> I like your idea about the future direction of vim - that's exactly the
> sort of thinking we need.
I/You need. Open source is about being able to adjust software to your
own selfish needs. Its not about altruism. And it looks like its me
needing a wiki only, because its m
The sequence is finished and should be ready for inclusion. I can add tests for
system()/readshell(), but only if somebody will tell me what preconditions I
should rely on (e.g. POSIX shell with at least printf; or working cat or type).
There is also a lack of tests for readfile()/writefile(), b
# HG changeset patch
# User ZyX
# Date 1383994886 -14400
# Sat Nov 09 15:01:26 2013 +0400
# Branch NL-funcs
# Node ID c25ccecf79b681e79005bb0b8aed9153094ce207
# Parent 268983a1e62d0f05a1cb9658a65e4578128f7f2c
Add type cast
diff --git a/src/ops.c b/src/ops.c
--- a/src/ops.c
+++ b/src/ops.c
@
# HG changeset patch
# User ZyX
# Date 1383995203 -14400
# Sat Nov 09 15:06:43 2013 +0400
# Branch NL-funcs
# Node ID b719d5d95852adc804831af9c524db3640382067
# Parent c25ccecf79b681e79005bb0b8aed9153094ce207
Add readshell() function
diff --git a/runtime/doc/eval.txt b/runtime/doc/eval.txt
# HG changeset patch
# User ZyX
# Date 1383992075 -14400
# Sat Nov 09 14:14:35 2013 +0400
# Branch NL-funcs
# Node ID 268983a1e62d0f05a1cb9658a65e4578128f7f2c
# Parent 5938d7011707823ab1a66bc3b3fe554ab9539e7a
Make system() support second argument that is a list.
Note: system() is currently
Even though I don't really want to start a discussion about technologies, I
agree with Justin that most of vim.org's content is static and doesn't need
a server-side framework. FWIW, kernel.org is made with a static site
generator.
The plugins section is obviously different and would need quite a
Hi Mark,
sorry it has taken me a few days to reply.
I wholeheartedly agree with most points you've made and think a better
integration with Github is quite important as most plugin development (or
at least the sort of development we want to encourage) happens there. Most
of the time I skip vim.or
12 matches
Mail list logo