Bram said:
> Thanks. I'll add it in the todo list. Although we may add uniq() instead.
> Consistancy with Unix is useful.
I just wanted to weigh in on the idea of adding uniq() instead of sortuniq().
The modularity of Unix commands is great and all, but when working with big
data sets you wa
On 25 March 2014, LCD 47 wrote:
[...]
> I'm attaching bellow my attempt to a fix. I also merged f_sort()
> and f_uniq() in a single function, and made some minor optimisations.
[...]
> +static int (*item_compare_func_ptr)__ARGS((const void *, const void
> *s2));
[...]
On 21 March 2014, Cade Forester wrote:
> > How about separating it from sort()? That is, an uniq()
> > function that would remove duplicates from an already sorted list
> > (results would be undefined if the input list is not sorted). That
> > would be consistent with how uniq(1) works on UN
Thanks ZyX and Bram for this.
I'm helping to maintain the ack.vim, a plugin to use ack as grepprg. One option
on the plugin is highlight the results after the search, to do that I am using
something like that:
if g:ackhighlight
setlocal hlsearch
let @/ = searched_term
let v:hlsearch = &hl
Patch 7.4.214
Problem:Compilation problems on HP_nonStop (Tandem).
Solution: Add #defines. (Joachim Schmitz)
Files: src/vim.h
*** ../vim-7.4.213/src/vim.h2014-02-23 22:52:33.352764716 +0100
--- src/vim.h 2014-03-24 17:25:40.328710672 +0100
***
*** 77,82
--- 77,8
