Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 219 by henrycha...@gmail.com: Noticed 2 issues with netrw v151
http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=219
Noticed 2 netrw issues in the new update of vim with netrw V151.
1. Got an error E382 when trying to save a re
ZyX wrote:
> Consider the following two operations:
>
> echo {} > {}
> echo [] > []
>
> . In first case Vim will report
>
> E736: Invalid operation for Dictionary
>
> (singular form). In the second case Vim will report
>
> E692: Invalid operation for Lists
>
> (*plural* form
Hi
Compiling vim with gcc 4.8 and "-Wall -Wextra" gave one warning. In
src/eval.c, the line 18322 "char_u *p;" hides a similar declaration and,
after a quick glance at the code, I believe it should be removed, or the
other declaration moved into a sub-block.
Regards
--
François
--
--
You recei
Hello
In a few words, here is a patch that makes gvim work better with ligatures
in fonts, which can be useful even for programmers. Details follow.
I tried to use a Hasklig[^1], a font with ligatures intended for the
Haskell language. It serves the same objective as the Haskell Conceal
script[^2
François Gannaz wrote:
> Compiling vim with gcc 4.8 and "-Wall -Wextra" gave one warning. In
> src/eval.c, the line 18322 "char_u *p;" hides a similar declaration and,
> after a quick glance at the code, I believe it should be removed, or the
> other declaration moved into a sub-block.
Thanks, I
François Gannaz wrote:
> In a few words, here is a patch that makes gvim work better with ligatures
> in fonts, which can be useful even for programmers. Details follow.
>
> I tried to use a Hasklig[^1], a font with ligatures intended for the
> Haskell language. It serves the same objective as t
