Re: Adding to quickfix list issue

On Monday, April 18, 2016 at 9:39:15 AM UTC+3, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Yegappan Lakshmanan wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Yegappan Lakshmanan > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Ramel Eshed wrote: > > >> On

Re: Asynchronous screen update

On Monday, April 18, 2016 at 8:35:18 PM UTC+3, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Ramel Eshed wrote: > > > On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 11:33:50 AM UTC+3, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > Ramel Eshed wrote: > > > > > > > When using “out_io”: “buffer” in the job options there are some issues > > > > with the

Re: Patch 7.4.1751

2016-04-18 21:25 GMT+03:00 Bram Moolenaar : > > Kazunobu wrote: > >> It looks src/testdir/test_tagjump.vim is missing in the GitHub repo. >> >> This is shown in the repo as patch 7.4.1751: >> https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/def5abe0a2727041ecee69afdccfca405333bd24 > > git add

Re: GitHub vim scripts - duplicate of vim.org

> I notice all the vim script on vim.org seem to be duplicated under: > https://github.com/vim-scripts > > Is this something Vim has done, or is this an independent process? AFAIK this is an automated script setup by someone. Don't see a name anywhere. > The reason I ask, is there are lots of

Re: Patch 7.4.1751

Kazunobu wrote: > It looks src/testdir/test_tagjump.vim is missing in the GitHub repo. > > This is shown in the repo as patch 7.4.1751: > https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/def5abe0a2727041ecee69afdccfca405333bd24 git add git add git add git add git add git add git add git add git add Keep

Re: GitHub vim scripts - duplicate of vim.org

Hi David! On Mo, 18 Apr 2016, David Fishburn wrote: > I notice all the vim script on vim.org seem to be duplicated under: > https://github.com/vim-scripts > > Is this something Vim has done, or is this an independent process? > > The reason I ask, is there are lots of comments and pull

Re: GitHub vim scripts - duplicate of vim.org

2016-04-18 21:02 GMT+03:00 David Fishburn : > I notice all the vim script on vim.org seem to be duplicated under: > https://github.com/vim-scripts > > Is this something Vim has done, or is this an independent process? > > The reason I ask, is there are lots of comments and

GitHub vim scripts - duplicate of vim.org

I notice all the vim script on vim.org seem to be duplicated under: https://github.com/vim-scripts Is this something Vim has done, or is this an independent process? The reason I ask, is there are lots of comments and pull requests against my plugins. Given I do not own that account, all I can

Re: Patch 7.4.1751

Hi, It looks src/testdir/test_tagjump.vim is missing in the GitHub repo. This is shown in the repo as patch 7.4.1751: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/def5abe0a2727041ecee69afdccfca405333bd24 Regards, Kazunobu 2016-04-19 2:47 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar : > > Patch 7.4.1751

Patch 7.4.1752

Patch 7.4.1752 Problem:When adding to the quickfix list the current position is reset. Solution: Do not reset the position when not needed. (Yegappan Lakshmanan) Files: src/quickfix.c, src/testdir/test_quickfix.vim *** ../vim-7.4.1751/src/quickfix.c 2016-03-27 18:44:36.823626960

Patch 7.4.1751

Patch 7.4.1751 Problem:Crash when 'tagstack' is off. (Dominique Pelle) Solution: Fix it. (Hirohito Higashi) Files: src/tag.c, src/testdir/test_alot.vim, src/testdir/test_tagjump.vim *** ../vim-7.4.1750/src/tag.c 2016-04-08 17:07:09.546160667 +0200 --- src/tag.c 2016-04-18

Re: [vim/vim] sh syntax hightlight breaks on "${VAR/FOO/\\[}" (#759)

On 2016-04-18, Charles Campbell wrote: > Alexander Meshcheryakov wrote: > > "${VAR/FOO/\\[}" > > > > is a bashism to substitute |'FOO'| in |$VAR| with |'\['| > > vim fails to notice trailing double quote and the of a script becomes > > highlighted as doublequoted. Demo script to check

Re: Asynchronous screen update

Ramel Eshed wrote: > On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 11:33:50 AM UTC+3, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Ramel Eshed wrote: > > > > > When using “out_io”: “buffer” in the job options there are some issues > > > with the screen rendering. The first one is when I try to edit the > > > command line while

Patch 7.4.1750

Patch 7.4.1750 Problem:When a buffer gets updated while in command line mode, the screen may be messed up. Solution: Postpone the redraw when the screen is scrolled. Files: src/channel.c *** ../vim-7.4.1749/src/channel.c 2016-04-14 12:46:33.608678731 +0200 ---

Re: [vim/vim] sh syntax hightlight breaks on "${VAR/FOO/\\[}" (#759)

Alexander Meshcheryakov wrote: > "${VAR/FOO/\\[}" > > is a bashism to substitute |'FOO'| in |$VAR| with |'\['| > vim fails to notice trailing double quote and the of a script becomes > highlighted as doublequoted. Demo script to check highlighting: > > #!/bin/bash > VAR1=FOOBAR >

Re: $VIMRUNTIME/syntax/vim.vim seems to be highlighted wrongly

2016/04/18 23:05 "Charles E Campbell" : > > tyru wrote: > > Hi Vimmers and Dr.Chip, > > > > Some items seems to be highlighted wrongly in my vimrc. > > Please see attached Vim script file, HTML(:TOhtml), screenshot. > > > > Vim script file: reproducible script > > HTML:

Re: $VIMRUNTIME/syntax/vim.vim seems to be highlighted wrongly

tyru wrote: > Hi Vimmers and Dr.Chip, > > Some items seems to be highlighted wrongly in my vimrc. > Please see attached Vim script file, HTML(:TOhtml), screenshot. > > Vim script file: reproducible script > HTML: ":TOhtml"'s result > PNG: screen capture of HTML > You might want to try swapping the

Re: gD broken in 7.4.1743

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 03:11:20PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > Is it expected or desired that gD is affected by 'ignorecase'? Case-insensitive languages exist, so I suppose it makes sense for gd/gD to pay attention to 'ignorecase'. :help says gd/gD work the same as * (except for skipping

Re: [vim/vim] Patch 7.4.1744 undoes patch 7.4.1743 (#765)

ConvertFromPyMapping also has no initial value. Why it does not warn there? `ret` is always used initialized now. 2016-04-18 14:17 GMT+03:00 David Watson : > In the function ConvertFromPySequence in src/if_py_both.h, ret has no > initial value (which clang warns

Re: Patch 7.4.1353

On Monday, 18 April 2016 02:58:49 UTC-7, Christian Brabandt wrote: > Hi Marslo! > > On Mo, 18 Apr 2016, Marslo Jiao wrote: > > > Sorry for bother you again. > > I found the python plugin dosen't work somehow after I using the > > "CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64-w64-mingw32- ARCH=x86-6". > > > > Here

Re: Patch 7.4.1353

Hi Marslo! On Mo, 18 Apr 2016, Marslo Jiao wrote: > Sorry for bother you again. > I found the python plugin dosen't work somehow after I using the > "CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64-w64-mingw32- ARCH=x86-6". > > Here what I did: > - install python 2.7 64-bit installer > - Install python 3.5 64-bit

Re: Patch 7.4.1353

On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 21:01:51 UTC-7, Ken Takata wrote: > Hi, > > 2016/3/16 Wed 3:16:20 UTC+9 Marslo Jiao wrote: > > On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 10:49:07 UTC-7, Ken Takata wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > 2016/3/16 Wed 2:35:06 UTC+9 Marslo Jiao wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 18 February 2016

Re: Adding to quickfix list issue

Yegappan Lakshmanan wrote: > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Yegappan Lakshmanan > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Ramel Eshed wrote: > >> On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 3:12:55 AM UTC+3, yega...@gmail.com wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> >