2016-07-13 3:44 GMT+03:00 Rafal :
> I'm using ex/vi with vagrant and each time when I'm printing verbose
> messages, they're scrambled across multiple lines, e.g.
>
> $ vagrant provision
> ==> default: Running provisioner: shell...
> default: Running: inline script
> ==> default: stdin: is not
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Bram Moolenaar
wrote:
>
>
> > dig reveals no A record. Perhaps ns.42.org is misconfigured at the moment?
>
> The problem is with SourceForge, vim.sf.net has the same problem.
> Shell service is also down.
>
> --
> Facepalm statement #5: "Petrol getting more expens
Patch 7.4.2031
Problem:The list_lbr_utf8 test fails if ~/.vim/syntax/c.vim sets
'textwidth' to a non-zero value. (Oyvind A. Holm)
Solution: Add a setup.vim file that sets 'runtimepath' and $HOME to a safe
value. (partly by Christian Brabandt, closes #912)
Files:
The recent updates to Vim to support 64-bit integers broke a plugin I was using
that provides a vimscript implementation of a pseudorandom number generator, by
sending it into a near-infinite loop.
The problem was that the plugin assumes 32-bit integers, so I "fixed" it with a
bitwise and() in
Ramel Eshed wrote:
[...]
> > > 2) The following script:
> > >
> > > func! Setbv()
> > > let rt = reltime()
> > > for i in range (1, 4)
> > > call setbufvar('mybuf', 'myvar', 2)
> > > endfor
> > > echo reltimestr(reltime(rt))
> > > endfunc
> > >
> > > Before setting any qu
Patch 7.4.2030
Problem:ARCH must be set properly when using MinGW.
Solution: Detect the default value of ARCH from the current compiler. (Ken
Takata)
Files: src/Make_cyg_ming.mak
*** ../vim-7.4.2029/src/Make_cyg_ming.mak 2016-07-10 13:57:35.889542273
+0200
--- src/M
Ken Takata wrote:
> Currently ARCH must be set properly when using MinGW (especially when
> compiling for x86_64). This patch detects the default value of ARCH
> from the current compiler if ARCH is not set.
Thanks!
--
He was not in the least bit scared to be mashed into a pulp
O
Patch 7.4.2029
Problem:printf() does not work with 64 bit numbers.
Solution: use the "L" length modifier. (Ken Takata)
Files: src/message.c, src/testdir/test_expr.vim
*** ../vim-7.4.2028/src/message.c 2016-07-09 17:05:49.207222368 +0200
--- src/message.c 2016-07-12 20:43:5
Ken Takata wrote:
> 2016/7/13 Wed 0:10:46 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The printf() function on Vim script doesn't support 64-bit Numbers.
> > E.g.:
> >
> > :echo 100
> > 100
> > :echo printf('%d', 100)
> > 276447232
> >
> > Attached patch
Ken Takata wrote:
> 2016/7/12 Tue 4:59:40 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > Ken Takata wrote:
> >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > > > I do think that the backslash (or any other special character that
> > > > > > might
> > > > > > be available) makes it ugly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Although we c
On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 at 12:34:43 PM UTC-5, Henrik Giesel wrote:
> Given: I open vim -u NONE a.c
>
> When: I type ifoo('bar','(','(');F,vib
>
> Then I expect: have ('bar','(','(') selected
>
> What actually happens: Nothing is selected
>
>
> I always thought this was weird. Why are those s
> >
> > Before setting any quickfix list it takes 0.22s. After setting a
> > quickfix list with 8 entries it takes 6.5 seconds, which is
> > actually worse than how it was before the last patches (it took then
> > 3.56s).
>
> Strange. Oh, perhaps it's because this "mybuf" is near the start o
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Manuel Ortega
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Bram Moolenaar
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Manuel Ortega wrote:
>>
>> > On Saturday, June 14, 2014 at 11:51:59 AM UTC-4, Justin M. Keyes wrote:
>> > > With shelltemp=0, Vim automatically falls back to using temp files
On 2016-07-11 23:36, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Øyvind A. Holm wrote:
> > Around one month ago, the test suite started to fail. It was around
> > the same day as I installed a new kernel, so I thought that
> > something was wrong locally. But when I noticed today that it also
> > fails on a server wi
Hi,
2016/7/13 Wed 0:10:46 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The printf() function on Vim script doesn't support 64-bit Numbers.
> E.g.:
>
> :echo 100
> 100
> :echo printf('%d', 100)
> 276447232
>
> Attached patch fixes the problem.
A test is added.
P
Hi,
The printf() function on Vim script doesn't support 64-bit Numbers.
E.g.:
:echo 100
100
:echo printf('%d', 100)
276447232
Attached patch fixes the problem.
Regards,
Ken Takata
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not
Hi Bram,
2016/7/12 Tue 4:59:40 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Ken Takata wrote:
>
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > > I do think that the backslash (or any other special character that
> > > > > might
> > > > > be available) makes it ugly.
> > > > >
> > > > > Although we can find the end of the express
On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 12:33:28 PM UTC+3, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Ramel Eshed wrote:
>
> > > > I'm not sure if this patch was supposed to fix the issue completely,
> > > > but there are still issues with the gui cursor.
> > > >
> > > > 1) When job output is redirected to a buffer:
> > > >
On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 12:33:28 PM UTC+3, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Ramel Eshed wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 8:23:15 PM UTC+3, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > > Lcd wrote:
> > >
> > > > [...]
> > > > > > Currently an error item from loclist looks like this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
19 matches
Mail list logo