2017-02-22 10:06 GMT+09:00 luchr :
> Sorry, sorry, I've lost context. I definitely thought my idea was wrong,
> because you wrote
>
> If it works, it means that mine is working to support the premise of your
> hypothesis, thus verifying the correctness of yours.
>
> Applying my patch on top did *n
2017-02-22 9:43 GMT+09:00 Kazunobu Kuriyama :
> 2017-02-22 9:28 GMT+09:00 luchr :
>
> > Here are the results:
> >
> > 1. case: applying my patch on top of it: problem still exists
> > 2. case: applying my patch on top of it and undoing one line of your
> > patch to have
> >
> > gui_redraw_block(Y_
Patch 8.0.0347
Problem:When using CTRL-X CTRL-U inside a comment, the use of the comment
leader may not work. (Klement)
Solution: Save and restore did_ai. (Christian Brabandt, closes #1494)
Files: src/edit.c, src/testdir/test_popup.vim
*** ../vim-8.0.0346/src/edit.c 2017-
Ben Fritz wrote:
> So, I know this is a very old system, but I've been self-compiling Vim
> on it successfully for some years now (I'm not an admin on the
> system):
>
> $ cat /etc/release
>Solaris 9 12/03 s9s_u5wos_08b SPARC
>Copyright 2003 Sun Microsystems,
Patch 8.0.0346
Problem:Vim relies on limits.h to be included indirectly, but on Solaris 9
it may not be. (Ben Fritz)
Solution: Always include limits.h.
Files: src/os_unixx.h, src/vim.h
*** ../vim-8.0.0345/src/os_unixx.h 2017-01-12 20:06:30.152522974 +0100
--- src/os_u
2017-02-21 22:47 GMT+03:00 Bram Moolenaar :
>
> Nikolai Pavlov wrote:
>
>> @brammool This is not fine. First, this shows yet another
>> inconsistency between different notations. Second, dictionary with
>> variables in not guaranteed to be `b:` and `let d = b:|call
>> islocked('d.changedtick')` err
Patch 8.0.0345
Problem:islocked('d.changedtick') does not work.
Solution: Make it work.
Files: src/buffer.c, src/eval.c, src/evalfunc.c, src/vim.h,
src/testdir/test_changedtick.vim
*** ../vim-8.0.0344/src/buffer.c2017-02-19 13:54:57.996966935 +0100
--- src/buffer.c
So, I know this is a very old system, but I've been self-compiling Vim on it
successfully for some years now (I'm not an admin on the system):
$ cat /etc/release
Solaris 9 12/03 s9s_u5wos_08b SPARC
Copyright 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
I noticed today that todo.txt contains the following:
> "ci[" does not look for next [ like ci" does look for next ".
> (J.F. 2017 Jan 7)
>
I'd like to express my support for the CURRENT behavior. I like being able to
work with constructs like this, if needed:
abc[
func(def[123],
2017-02-21 3:24 GMT+09:00 luchr :
> Let's see if I can answer the question with a concrete example (real
> numbers, logged from the code):
>
> The current code is written in such a way that necessary redraw always,
> immediately follows for each rectangle region once the same region has been
> cle
10 matches
Mail list logo
