On Jan 6, 4:13 pm, Ingo Karkat <sw...@ingo-karkat.de> wrote: > Wow, I hoped it would be simple, but I didn't imagine it THAT simple :-) Any > insights whether the implementation of passing FALSE was deliberate? > > I can at least confirm that this patch fixes the issue in my automated tests. > I > will run through my other 10 test suites, try some of my mappings and plugins > with it, and report any problem if I find one. Naturally, I would like to have > this in Vim ASAP. > > Thanks for the quick reply, Bram! > > -- regards, ingo
Hi, I can also confirm that the solution proposed by Bram fixes the issue. I've created a Vim script that remaps normal mode commands to provide some sort of "line-based jump memory", and until then the script wasn't properly working in ":normal" when counts were used; now everything works like a charm. Thank you Bram, Ingo, and ZyX for forwarding the issue to this mailing list. Best regards, -- Douglas A. Augusto -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
