On Sunday, March 22, 2015 at 2:43:22 AM UTC, yega...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> > Yegappan Lakshmanan wrote:
> >
> >> I am attaching a patch to add the :cdo and :ldo commands. The :cdo command
> >> can be used to execute commands over
ith any further findings.
Thanks,
Drew
On Monday, April 6, 2015 at 6:41:10 PM UTC+1, yega...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Drew Neil wrote:
> > On Sunday, March 22, 2015 at 2:43:22 AM UTC, yega...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
>
On Wednesday, July 1, 2015 at 12:54:45 PM UTC+1, Florian Walch wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 1, 2015 at 12:48:50 AM UTC+3, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > On Mo, 29 Jun 2015, Florian Walch wrote:
> >
> > > On Monday, June 29, 2015 at 12:40:28 PM UTC+3, Drew Neil wrote:
> &
I agree with h_east that if you’re planning to run the :substitute command
across multiple files, it makes sense to use:
:cfdo %s/pattern/replacement/g
and not:
:cdo s/pattern/replacement/g
I can also see myself wanting to use the :cdo command in combination with
:normal for certain typ
in a file. Would it be possible to update the
quickfix list could also between edits that modify the number of characters
in a line?
Drew
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Drew Neil
wrote:
> I agree with h_east that if you’re planning to run the :substitute command
> across multiple fil
I can see myself finding uses for both :cdo and :cfdo.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Ingo Karkat wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 30-Jul-2015 08:21, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > Am 2015-07-29 22:34, schrieb Yegappan Lakshmanan:
> >> I haven't see any replies so
?
Drew
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Yegappan Lakshmanan
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Yegappan Lakshmanan
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Drew Neil
> wrote:
> >> I agree with h_east that if you’re
, Yegappan Lakshmanan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Drew Neil
> wrote:
> > Would it make sense to break this patch in two? One patch could contain
> the
> > implementation for :cfdo and :lfdo. The other patch could contain the
> > implementatio
On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 4:31:26 PM UTC, gev...@gmail.com wrote:
> Last night, just at the New Year, I have discovered for myself a stenotyping
> with Plover:
> http://stenoknight.com/wiki/FAQ
> http://www.openstenoproject.org/
> http://stenoknight.com/kws.html
> and I think it is great!
>
>
