[patch] Test for 7.3.414

Hi I couldn't find a test for what 7.3.414 fixed. Check attached patch. -- Greetings Elias -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You r

[patch] Uninitialized Variable

Hi GCC warns that a variable might be uninitialized. See attached patch. -- Greetings Elias -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You

[patch] Tests for 7.3.192

Hi I didn't find tests for what 7.3.192 fixed. Therefore I added two. One for each regexp engine. Please check. -- Greetings Elias -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit ht

[patch] Remove unused assignment

Hi This patch removes an unused assignment. -- Greetings Elias -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because

[patch] An additional test for virtual edit

Hi there I didn't find a test for replacing in virtual edit mode on a tab. So I wrote one. Note that there are tests in test39.in for virtual edit mode and tabs, but they do not replace (r). -- Greetings Elias -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! T

[patch] Consistent naming

Hi all Give the constant 0 a consistent name in vim.h. Please check, I'm not yet that familiar with vim development. -- Greetings Elias -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, vi

[comment patch] Tiny typo

Hi there A tiny typo in os_unix.c. See attached patch. -- Greetings Elias -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this mess

[patch] Indent correctly

Hi there Here's a small patch to correctly indent macro code. -- Greetings Elias -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received th

Re: [Bug] ftplugin/man.vim

Hi On 2014-11-02, Mahyar Abbas pour wrote: > I think there is a problem with ftplugin/man.vim I think you should contact the maintainer of that file. It's in the header. In this case: " Maintainer: SungHyun Nam -- Greetings Elias -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" mai

Re: Some direct questions about vim source code

Hi there On 2014-02-07, Christian Brabandt wrote: > mch_ are system dependent functions I always think of it as "machine". -- Greetings Elias -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more informa

[patch] Refactoring of Swapfile Dialog

Hi there This is a refactoring that gives some magic numbers some names. -- Greetings Elias -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You

Re: Another compile warning

On 2013-05-30, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > I wonder why it doesn't complain about save_lpos. Well, right now I wonder too. -- Greetings Elias -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information,

Another compile warning

Hi there I get another compile warning: --- In file included from regexp.c:7811:0: regexp_nfa.c: In function ‘addstate’: regexp_nfa.c:2820:36: warning: ‘save_ptr’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]

Compile warning.

Hello all, I get a compiler warning for regexp_nfa.c. gcc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFEAT_GUI_GTK -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0

[format patch] Indentation in vim.h

Hi there Here's a small patch to fix some identation in vim.h. Nothing else. -- Greetings Elias -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php diff -r c

[[doc patch] Missing ' for an option] resend

Hello Vim Devs I sent the following message on 25th of June to this list but can't find it through the web interface. Did you apply the patch Bram? Well it's still the same. Greetings Elias -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the t

[doc patch] Missing ' for an option

Hi there I found a missing ' for an option in insert.txt. See attached patch. Greetings Elias -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php diff -r dbb08

[format patch] Indent of #ifdefs

Hello all Specifically nested #ifdefs weren't indented correctly. Greetings Elias -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php diff -r dbb084863466 src/

Re: [man][de][rfr] vim.1 translated to German, please review

Hi Florian On 2012-06-17 Florian Rehnisch wrote: > I would be gratituded if some german fellow could comment > it. Here's a patch of what I think should be changed. Feel free to apply it. It's for the file vim-de.1 Greetings Elias -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do

[format patch] Unnested ifdef

Hello everybody This is a very small patch. The preprocessor directive is not nested. It distracted me a little. Greetings Elias -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://ww

[patch] possible doc bug

Hi there In the file eval.c, there's probably a documentation bug. See attached patch. Elias -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php diff -r 379a63

Re: [patch] Code style

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:22:25PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Please check the maintainer, for this file it's Charles Campbell. Right. It seems like Charles already patched it. Thanks. -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text

[patch] Vim code style

Hi all, again some patches for vim's code style. This time only for c files. Greetings Elias -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php diff -r f530ae

Re: [patch] Code style

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Elias Diem wrote: > > > does the code style also apply to vim script? > > I would think so. > > > Well, here's a small patch for a vim script file. > > - if(has("am

[patch] Code style

Hello there, does the code style also apply to vim script? Well, here's a small patch for a vim script file. Elias -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/mail

[patch] Code style

Hello all a patch for Vim's code style that does not change any functionality. Elias -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php *** ../vim/src/os_qnx.c

[patch] Vim's code style

Hello all, here's another patch for vim's code style, no functionality changed. Elias -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php *** ../vim/src/gui_ph

[patch] Vim's coding style

Hi there This is a patch that doesn't change any functionality. It just formats the code according to vim's code style. Greetings Elias -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit ht

Re: Another patch for vim's coding style

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:38:41PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Elias Diem wrote: > > > This is again a small patch to stick closer to vim's code style. > > > > A question though: > > Does it make sense to ``produce'' such patches? > >

Another patch for vim's coding style

Hi all This is again a small patch to stick closer to vim's code style. A question though: Does it make sense to ``produce'' such patches? I think it is very cumbersome to have a look at such patches. Many many lines of code. As far as I'm concerned, I don't bother producing them. I just like to

Re: Maybe doc bug?

Thanks Bram -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

Maybe doc bug?

Hello all, is the following a bug in the documentation? In the 'change.txt' file it says: *!!* !!{filter} Filter [count] lines through the external program {filter}. The variable [count] is not shown