I like the idea for a threshold, but it would be a ton of work since it
would have to use threads and locking and vim isn't thread safe. This is
way more work than I am willing to put in even if it means this patch
doesn't get merged.
-Matt
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Anton Bobrov wrote:
13 at 05:24:53PM -0700, Matthew Kaniaris wrote:
> > Anton,
> >
> > What do you mean by long running timers? Are you suggesting we look at
> the
> > running time of the current timer?
> >
> > -Matt
>
> Yes, exactly. As far as I understand the implementatio
Anton,
What do you mean by long running timers? Are you suggesting we look at the
running time of the current timer?
-Matt
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Anton Bobrov wrote:
> > It wouldn't be unreproducible, nor would it be a glitch. I'd get a
> prominent error message if I pressed CTRL-C
Ben,
There is an error message when they are canceled. I don't think there is
any good way to revive intervals that have been interrupted.
-Matt
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Ben Fritz wrote:
> On Monday, October 14, 2013 9:55:28 AM UTC-5, Ernie Rael wrote:
> > On 10/14/2013 5:06 AM, Ben
David,
Is it currently possible to introspect the file and line number of call
site of sitetimeout? I think it would be enough to just error message that
info when a timer is canceled.
-Matt
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:51 AM, David Fishburn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:53 PM, kans wrot
