[PATCH] Right-aligned signs

2013-09-23 Thread James
Right now, there can't be right-aligned one-character signs(like "sign define rightsign text=\ r"), because prefixing a sign with a space breaks the define statement. The "text=" argument for signs uses skiptowhite_esc, which forces whitespace in the argument to be escaped, but then never actua

Re: [PATCH] Right-aligned signs

2019-01-02 Thread Yegappan Lakshmanan
Hi all, The following item is in the todo list: Patch to right-align signs. (James Kolb (email james), 2013 Sep 23) This item refers to the below e-mail. But with patch 8.1.0588 (Cannot define a sign with space in the text), signs with space character in the name are supported. So this item can

Re: [PATCH] Right-aligned signs

2019-01-03 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Yegappan wrote: > The following item is in the todo list: > > Patch to right-align signs. (James Kolb (email james), 2013 Sep 23) > > This item refers to the below e-mail. But with patch 8.1.0588 > (Cannot define a sign with space in the text), signs with space > character in the name are supp

Re: [PATCH] Right-aligned signs

2013-09-25 Thread Bram Moolenaar
James wrote: > Right now, there can't be right-aligned one-character signs(like "sign > define rightsign text=\ r"), because prefixing a sign with a space > breaks the define statement. > > The "text=" argument for signs uses skiptowhite_esc, which forces > whitespace in the argument to be escap

Re: [PATCH] Right-aligned signs

2013-09-26 Thread James Kolb
Yep, I'm James Kolb. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > James wrote: > > > Right now, there can't be right-aligned one-character signs(like "sign > > define rightsign text=\ r"), because prefixing a sign with a space > > breaks the define statement. > > > > The "text="