Re: [vim/vim] "simplify()" does not reduce multiple leading path separators (#6263)

2020-06-15 Fir de Conversatie Gary Johnson
On 2020-06-15, dylnmc wrote: > @brammool I have been following this issue, and I was hoping that there could > be an optional parameter to remove all forward slashes at the front except for > the first one. > > This is because I am using paths as keys to a dictionary, and without simplify > () rem

Re: [vim/vim] "simplify()" does not reduce multiple leading path separators (#6263)

2020-06-15 Fir de Conversatie Gary Johnson
On 2020-06-15, lacygoill wrote: > This is not a bug. The simplify() function should leave two leading > slashes alone. > > Although, if the specification says that more than 2 leading slashes should be > treated as a single slash, then maybe this could be considered as a bug: > > echo sim

Re: [vim/vim] "simplify()" does not reduce multiple leading path separators (#6263)

2020-06-15 Fir de Conversatie Gary Johnson
On 2020-06-15, lacygoill wrote: > Describe the bug > > simplify() does not reduce multiple leading path separators. > > To Reproduce > > Run this shell command: > > vim -Nu NONE -es +"pu=simplify('//tmp')|%p" +'qa!' > > The output is //tmp. > > Expected behavior > > The output is /tmp. > >